View Single Post
  #18  
Old 10-26-2010, 08:33 PM
exwestracer's Avatar
exwestracer exwestracer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 83
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mean 69 View Post

That is certainly one design approach, but there is more than one way to skin a really fast cat. The LD approach considered this, and designed differently for very sound engineering reasons. In terms of force application being an issue with angled lower links, again, if the structure, links, rear housing and all other mechanicals are sufficiently rigid, this is not an issue. Certainly within the traction potential of a 345 wide R Racing compound road race tire in this example, a "modest" contemporary "Pro Touring" inspired engine (750 HP?), and portly curb weight (3400-3600 lbs, more?), there is not an issue with this approach. Honest. And I'm not trying to get into a wee-wee contest at all, there was a LOT of thought put into that system and virtually no design element was done without regard for consequence. You need to pick your battles, as you can't have it all in one package.

Back to your regularly scheduled program.

Mark
Apologies for my lack of insight as to the LD design paramters. I have seen a number of these setups done in exactly that fashion for tire clearance. My comments regarding keeping the links straight and level are general "can't go wrong" guidelines for those who are unfamiliar with the intricate details of link type suspensions.
__________________
Ray Kaufman-Wyotech chassis fab instructor
Custom suspension design and consultation.
(Now 2) Big Block asphalt supermodified ('cause too much is never enough...)
Reply With Quote