And now I'm at home and I can't think about anything else but this...
We asked Lee if the rear end was stock, and if the wheel wells were stock, and he did say, to his knowledge that they were. That's when we responded and said, then we have a recommended fit that we know "fits".
I'm still not convinced his rear end is stock for his car at 61" from drum to drum.
Also, we take into account a disc brake upgrade, which Lee wants to do, which will push out his wheels another .200" on each side.
Now, Lee is arguing that my definition of "fit" is different. Do they rub? No. But because he has 1.75" of room to go inboard, or wider, he is saying they don't "fit".
From the photos, and from the conversation I've had with Tim Bruning, I think Lee should narrow the rear end by an 1" (like he intended too) and run a 305 wide tire if he wants to go wider, and fill up his gap more.
Another contributing factor, the photos don't show the upper hump (or wheel well hump) that resides above his rear fender trim by about 2" that if he doesn't narrow his rear end like he said he was going to, is going to be a problem. They should not be 3/8" from the lower fender lip, but from that upper hump.
Like I said above, I'm sick of this bull ****. Seems like now when a customer has an issue, they threaten to come on here and blast vendors and put good vendors like us, who work our asses off to help, out of business, regardless if we're to blame, or if we tried to take care of it.
"So I'm going to go on to Lateral-G and Pro-touring and tell everyone your not going to help me Jon" -Lee Samaie.
So what, in order to prevent that, I have to pay the 700 bucks its gong to take to widen your rear wheels for you because what we recommended, although doesn't rub, isn't the widest you could have gone, or your going to publicly slander me an my business all over the internet. **** it, go right ahead.