View Single Post
  #27  
Old 10-03-2011, 08:28 AM
wmhjr wmhjr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James OLC View Post
As I said - "The Tucker's don't seem to have any issues telling the story though...". There is, however, a lot of effort being being made by others to minimize discussion about the incident.
There are good reasons for this also. I recognize that there are pros and cons to release of some information, however IN GENERAL (to be clear, not making any statements about this event) once things get out in the public domain there is no longer any control, and it is getting more and more difficult to satisfy event insurance, liability, legal, and venue restrictions. Problem is that on the web things tend to spiral out of control and often out of context - and in some cases this could result in less events being possible. It's all well and good when things are discussed here. Right up until the point where the underwriter discovers a thread and refuses future liability coverage. Then we'll be reducing the number of (well run) events rather than increasing them. Just something to think about.
Reply With Quote