Quote:
Originally Posted by John510
My rear G Link review...
Looks pretty but car will not sit as low as I want it. Even if I dump it the Fab9 filler tube hits the shock mount once the wheels are flush with the quarters.
In Hindsight I would have went DSE or Ridetech.
|
Hey John I saw your car at Pleasanton Goodguys, that thing is going to look nice when its done
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparks67
Another option to consider is the art morrison 3 link or their triangulated 4 link. http://www.artmorrison.com/gallery/m...g2_itemId=8938
Well, the weakest part on the early camaro's is that most of the rear frame rail need to be replaced. I went with DSE Quadra-link back in 07, and I like it. Although, don't assume that you rear frame rails is solid. You won't know till you have your car apart. Do you have a stock 8.2 10 bolt? That was in the 67-69 camaros. The 8.5 10 bolts came out in 70's. Actually, I recommend a Ford 9-inch rear end.
Jeff |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparks67
The OEM rails only have 3 sides, so not really a rail. I think most people make the mistake that a 40+ year old car will be solid, but honestly it is not. Then they blame it on the suspension manufacturer, when it fails.
Jeff
|
I spoke to Craig Morrison at Pleasanton and looked at there setup this weekend. Nice but almost twice the price. I have an 8.5 10 bolt from a 70's car. Not really into 9-inches, I have a hook up for rear ends/parts. My car is in bare metal right now and the rails are in good shape but I know they are the weak link when adding aftermarket suspensions.