Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeefi
The new Holley system is a big jump from the 950, it had to be, that had a lot to be desired. But just a little fyi for instance, FAST's new 2.0 for instance now has about 3 or 4 transient fueling tables/features that the Accel has had since '04.
And when you have more transient fueling tables you CAN'T have worse drivability, unless you don't know how to use them.
Again the new Holley system is much better than it's little brother but I'd still put the drivability of the Accel against anything in this class.
How many patents does the Holley or FAST have? 0, Accel? 3. The Accel was the innovator. And for sake of arguement I became an Accel dealer after I bought the system.
Thanks.
|
I agree in lots of areas...the C950 was never meant to compete with the likes of Felpro/SpeedPro or Accel 6.0 (at that time). Only meant to supercede the 4DI offering they had...which was never a "serious" venture into EFI. The Accel units were pioneers in the day....so was the gold rush of 1848!
That being said...I've tune old school Motec M48's which could do "anything" you wanted back in the day...but it was alot of work for myself even though I had literally hundreds of hours on everything from Accel, Haltech, SDS etc...
I support many systems...there is one fact and Jody pointed that out above...the end user just can't wrap their heads around the deepest concepts..so whether is a Sportsman or Pro key option...a majority of end users won't ever get that deep. I must compliment you on your abilities with the system...it does have some good merits but, still stand behind my though that it's dated and are better options today.