I never even mentioned that I arguing Jonny’s opinion of how the car felt or made reference to the fact that I had even seen the car, we all know I have not driven it.
This was not an attack on credibility at all and my opening post does not reference that in any way, if anything it was attack on your writing skills and your ability to let the reader know the real world results. Although your before and aft times are published the verbage you chose to describe the before chassis in this thread and in that article don't jive. Here you describe it as it so-so everyday suspension, while the article describes it as "high performance", and "performance-oriented".
Quote:
|
Wow, arn't we all lucky to have you here to save us.. lol.. I feel dumber just reading this thread
|
Quote:
|
So, anyone that likes Air Spring suspension is a pusy and has been "pussified"?? How manly of you to point that out
|
Dumbing down or pussification in no way refers to air bags, this thread , or you. They refer to the way people treat each other as a whole. Would you rather I had simply stated "wow, great job Steve. You guys have a great magazine and no one should ever question you or your articles"? I’m sure your sarcastic reply will imply that there is a nicer way of stating my opinion but I ask, why should anyone have to go through the trouble to throw in a few dozen extra verbs on the off chance someone might take offense otherwise?
Let’s be honest Steve, I highly doubt you have really felt “dumber” by reading anything I have posted.