View Single Post
  #121  
Old 05-27-2012, 11:01 AM
DFRESH's Avatar
DFRESH DFRESH is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: South Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I followed Todd's setup on his car and had great confidence going into the purchase of my G-Bar (Original Version) since it was proven by him at the track and on the street (even though I knew I would need to modify the end links). Like many of you, the fact that there was only a small amount of fabrication required was also a draw.

At the time of this purchase, some others vendors had just come into the market with new designs, specifically Torque arms. When Todd ran into the framerail problem, I knew that at some point my car would also have 335's and track tires like Todds. Now, I know that the framerail issue can be resolved through additional efforts, however, after seeing Speedtech's Nova at RTTC run, and the simplicity of the setup, I will be putting one in my car. It removes the upper bar/framerail stress issue completely for me, allows for the ride height I like, there is very little fabrication, and it is proven on the track as well.

I'm not saying my car doesn't work, it does very well for what its got in it. But I am currently running 300 treadwear tires with 275/35 20's on the rear. It's not putting nearly the stress on the frame through the G-Bar that some 335's and 100 treadwear tires would, thus my frame rails have been ok thus far. I did modify my end links to heim's, but that's it.

At the end of the day, for me, it's what has been proven to work on the track. If it works there, then I have no worries about street miles. Todd's car is the testimony of the G-Bar--how it's worked, and the shortcomings.

The G-Link, after seeing Roger's car and being able to get in it and driving it a few laps through the Auto X, is impressive. However, the fact that both this car and Payback suffered respective framerail issues helped make my decision easier.

Doug
Reply With Quote