View Single Post
  #14  
Old 04-04-2006, 10:12 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XcYZ
Jeff, you're right. Lateral-g can be calculated.

Lateral g = 1.22 * radius of track / (lap time * lap time)

EDIT: I don't know where the 1.22 factor comes from, maybe someone could explain that to me. Dennis?

There becomes a point where it doesn't work though.. for example you couldn't have a 50 ft skidpad.. or one that is 3000 ft.. Maybe it was a 125ft skidpad. When I first made my mention that there is no such thing I thought the testing was done by Super Chevy and in that case there is no such thing. If some outside group or person did the testing then who knows what they used.

Still, the car did not go through 420 ft of cones spaced 70 feet apart at 58mph modified and 55mph with leaf springs.. no way.. no how.. :shrug:
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote