View Single Post
  #8  
Old 07-03-2012, 03:29 PM
jsr69's Avatar
jsr69 jsr69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Middleton, Idaho
Posts: 82
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeefi View Post
If you're going to drive it then the Accel, it has the most extensive maps that relate to good drivability. If you want extensive datalogging etc. I'd do the BS3.
The FAST EZ stuff has it's applications as well but don't underestimate being able to control spark, especially where you live. More spark when it's cold will allow it to drive much better. Also the ability for individual cylinder trim, and you don't necessarily need a dyno to utilize that feature.

The EZ systems don't have spark control and run a bit richer to try to deliver comparable drivability vs a sequential system like the Accel or XFI with full tunability. But imo the EZ stuff is no match for a well tuned sequential system on an IR type intake.
Mark

Thanks for the info. I have been concerned about the EZ system not having spark control and for that reason hadn't jump yet. I'll spend some more time looking at the Accel.
__________________
Steve Spoor
69 Rally Sport with Quadra-Link, Wayne Due C-4 Subframe, T-56, 420 SB2.2

67 Chevelle, Art Morrison Chassis, 416 LS3, T-56 (under construction)
Reply With Quote