View Single Post
  #9  
Old 04-18-2006, 07:22 PM
Steve Chryssos's Avatar
Steve Chryssos Steve Chryssos is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,893
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by race-rodz
even with the paddle shifter, you still need to "select" gears, the paddle shifter is only for up/down shifts in forward gears. so the push button deal is there for the manual selcetion of gear, instead of a typical shifter.
and im sure the trans in the 56 on american hot rod was an elec trans, and i think the paddle shifter was for manu-matic action.
Correct. NOTHING wrong with using a linear actuator to move the detent from Park to Reverse to Drive. So the pushbutton deal is fine for basic gear selection. Now performance up and down shifting is another thing altogether. Here, rapidly moving between forward gears is best left to a fully electronic solution. Plugging a paddle shifter into a linear actuator on a pre-electronic trans will yield the exact same sloppy, untimely response as grabbing a mechanical floor or column shifter. But with a paddle shifter, the driver EXPECTS gear changes to happen quickly. Electrons are the way to go.

And unless there is some sort of downshift prevention, paddle shifting into 1st at high rpm could lead to over-revving engine or trans failure which in turn could lead to locked wheels--regardless of the shift mechanism. With a paddle shifter, making that mistake is just that much easier. Electronic trans controllers won't let that happen. I stated that I hope that semi-electronic solution has some sort of downshift prevention since the system is not connected to electronic engine and VSS (wheel speed) sensors.
__________________
________________
Steve Chryssos


Ridetech.com
Reply With Quote