View Single Post
  #2983  
Old 09-06-2013, 11:10 AM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 159 Times in 105 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
My honest opinion --- that's what your DYNO operator should have been helping you with....


A guess on timing is a motor that's going to have problems.
There is no guessing here on timing. We already tuned for timing on the dyno. And you know his rep. He isn't a schlep. (Hey that rhymes)

This is just for the start up and low rpm retard. I am not putting in MORE timing. We are already running at least 2 degrees less advance than what we tested fine on the dyno, but since power difference was less than 1% 30* is where it stays. Add to that E85 has much better anti-detonation characteristics than gas and we are in a pretty conservative safe zone, all things considered.

I already discussed with Mike that I was going to put some retard in down low with my programmable box and he agreed it was a good idea.

That being said, some smarter guys than me on Corner Carvers encouraged me to increase the timing from 0 to about 800 rpm and then have a constant retard surrounding my idle rpm (300 rpm on each side of it -- target idle is approx 1100) and then at 1400 rpm start pulling out the retard (advancing more) in a linear fashion up to 3000 rpm. Again, smarter guys than me! Here is where I am out now. They encouraged me to add a MAP sensor if I really start driving this on the street a lot but only time will tell how much that is.

__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote