View Single Post
  #7  
Old 07-11-2006, 01:10 PM
Blown353 Blown353 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 925
Thanks: 0
Thanked 88 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitrorocket
Lower the compression to 8:1 and you will be fine for 600+ RWHP with a Intercooled D1SC on 91 octane. The crank is by far the week link, it will be on the edge for sure.

Good luck!
8:1 is too low and outside the efficiency range for a centrifugal IMO. I'm running about 9.2:1 on 91 octane, non-intercooled for now (water injection though) with 15 psi of boost through an intake that flows 305 per port and heads that flow 290/220 @ .600 (and have very good midlift flow and a very good I/E ratio across the board)-- so that 15psi of boost doesn't mean I'm trying to shove too much air through crappy heads/intake.

Given that supercharger cams are longer duration and "nastier" than turbo cams, having the compression ratio too low means poor overall efficiency when off-boost. That's OK for a race car but a bad move for a street car IMO. Better to keep the compression up some and the boost down a little to maintain off-boost mannerisms. Granted, you will sacrifice some of the all-out HP and boost potential that you could have with a lower static CR and more boost but the engine will be much more pleasant when off-boost with the higher CR.

Like anything, it's a series of compromises, and for a street car with a centrifugal going more compression and less boost is the way to go.
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.

Last edited by Blown353; 07-11-2006 at 01:29 PM.
Reply With Quote