Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mkelcy
I'm curious why you think a thread that discusses the pros and cons of the various front suspension alternatives and the relative cost of each is not "good info." We've seen threads that go on at length what it takes to be a "real P-T" car, but this one is useless?
|
Pros and cons based on what? so far it's only based on $$.. I've seen very little data in this thread and lots of assumptions.
And the threads about "what it takes to be a real P-T car" are just as pointless.. everyone want to define stuff and segment the hobby rather than just enjoy the moment. I guess it's human nature.
Quote:
|
No, I was responding to a series of posters in this thread that seem to imply that if you don't entirely replace the stock sub, you can't get your car to handle well.
|
Maybe you can show me where this was said??? The example you quoted said that a STOCK suspension handled badly.. and somehow from that you took "the entire subframe has to be replaced or your car sucks" from that?
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."
See Bad Penny run the cones:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U
1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada
1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS