
08-16-2014, 12:26 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 358Mustang
Thanks a lot for the diagram of your suspension. That helps me a lot to visualize things... This is a strict road race car, that I am trying to build it to be as fast as possible (isn't that the point? 
|
You're welcome.
I don't think you should pull ideas from my design if you're building a suspension for a conventional set-up. Mine is optimized for a high-travel/low-roll setup and would not be optimum for a low-travel/high-roll set-up. It's not that it can't be run that way, but the geometry is not correct for a low travel/high roll set-up. For example, in a high travel set-up like mine, I have the geometry designed to be optimum for 4.5" of dive at the crossmember and a roll angle of 0.8°. Everything is different for low travel.
You will need different:
A. Anti-dive percentage
B. Roll Center location (static & dynamic)
C. Camber gain
D. Caster Gain
E. Bump Steer
If you build yours like mine & travel the front end 1-1/4" and roll it 3.0° ... the camber gain is too small, the caster gain is too small, the roll center is not optimum, etc. I suggest looking at examples in road race suspension design books printed before 2005.
Best wishes & don't hesitate to share or ask for help. Lots of good guys on this site.

__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
|