View Single Post
  #61  
Old 02-13-2015, 08:40 PM
Che70velle's Avatar
Che70velle Che70velle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 2,256
Thanks: 653
Thanked 187 Times in 126 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitz78ta View Post
Just my opinion, but I think you would be money (or fuel mileage) ahead doing a 5.3 over a 4.8. I know my foot stays further on the floor to get and keep the 4.8 in my work truck moving more so then my wife's Tahoe or my old personal truck with 5.3's in them.

Also the tune can play a lot into MPG depending on how he drives. You can always be more lean on a daily driver than you can on a car that you are going to beat the snot out of, so keep that in mind as well. Just be sure to let him know this in advance
Agreed. We purchased a couple of 4.8 work vans in 2005 for the fuel economy. The advertised mpg was higher with the 4.8 option, so instead of going with the 6.0 liter vans, which were the same price by the way at the time, we opted for fuel economy. BIG mistake. I have to keep my foot in the gas way more to keep the van up to speed, which kills my mileage. Flat ground is ok, but not a lot of that in North Georgia. Lesson learned.
__________________
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------
70 velle' on custom chassis w/custom RideTech coilovers, RED sleeved 434” with Mamo 265’s, F-body Magnum, 12 bolt 3:73, wilwood 6/4's, bla, bla, bla...build. thread https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=39631
New 434” engine build here https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...ved-block.html

Thanks Dad!!

My Chevelle is old school... It has a belt driven power steering pump.
They're 17's, but I keep em clean!
Reply With Quote