View Single Post
  #6  
Old 10-01-2015, 02:15 AM
71RS/SS396's Avatar
71RS/SS396 71RS/SS396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wake Forest,NC
Posts: 872
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJDMan View Post
The problem I see with that style cross member is that the weight of the transmission is supported by the thin sheet metal floor pan and not the more substantial sub frame rails. While it does provide for more exhaust clearance under the floor, it also is more prone to flexing and possible floor pan sagging. On the other hand a conventional cross member ties all three mount points of the engine/trans assembly into the sub frame creating one complete assembly. It just seems to me that you give up some rigidity by not tying the cross member to the sub frame. Just sayin.
Steve, I'm willing to bet it's tied into the rocker panels which will provide plenty of support and strength. DSE did mine in a similar fashion with tubing running the entire width of the car tied into the rockers. It's had 760 hp going through it with no problem.
Reply With Quote