View Single Post
  #4  
Old 03-06-2016, 12:05 PM
mfain mfain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 453
Thanks: 76
Thanked 108 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rustomatic View Post
I think a picture of the car's stance (ride height) would help here, especially relative to Ron's idea. I had an '03 SVT Ficas, I mean Focus, and while it handled great, what was interesting was that it was the only front-drive car I'd driven that would willingly hang the rear out in a turn (in a very manageable way). It's interesting how good tires might change this dynamic . . .

Secondarily, I remember the control-blade rear as being very difficult to lower for some reason--it might have been that bushings would bind as the car got closer to the ground, which would serve to prop the car up . . .
Here are a couple of pictures. The rear suspension has the SVT set-up with Massive Speed Systems adjustable camber and toe links, Eibach (soft) springs, and Koni adjustable shocks. I'm sure Ron is right about the roll center migration. Also, I was low on fuel and the tank is located low on the passenger side, so more fuel weight would have been good ballast.

Name:  Focus R7s.jpg
Views: 202
Size:  100.6 KB

Name:  Focus at WHP Mustang.jpg
Views: 209
Size:  126.7 KB
Reply With Quote