View Single Post
  #10  
Old 04-01-2017, 12:27 PM
71RS/SS396's Avatar
71RS/SS396 71RS/SS396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wake Forest,NC
Posts: 872
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raustinss View Post
Think we might be putting too much on this "track" use thing ....how many cars for how many yrs have lived with wet sump on a track , yes a scraper,windage tray ,larger pan etc will help but, it's not like this engine will cavitate from SOME track use . Not to mention even still the first few yrs of the ls7's love to grenade themselves do to the oiling system design .
Well considering his statement "700hp on a road track can make some heat and piston squirters do help keep temps down" I don't think there's too much emphasis being put on track use.
The early LS7's grenaded because the tank was too small which is why GM went to a larger capacity tank. The LS7 dry sump is far from perfect but it's still better than a wet sump for track use. LS engines have horrible windage problems combined with the fact the oil pumps go into duress above 6,200 rpm, this results in a oil pan full of a frothy aerated milkshake for oil when you run at high rpm on a track. With a dry sump at least you have a larger supply of oil and a higher column of oil above the pick-up that allows the air to separate from the oil and rise to the top, that's not going to happen with a wet sump pan.
Reply With Quote