Thread: Investing 102
View Single Post
  #5898  
Old 11-19-2017, 10:05 AM
toy71camaro toy71camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northern California (Stanislaus County)
Posts: 444
Thanks: 19
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSLance View Post
Wow!! That is WAY more elaborate than mine!! Thanks for sharing... I might have to sleep on that for a bit to see if I want that much detail or not. Very nice though...



So...I have a holding that has been beaten up a bit in share price (down 47.99%) but still pays a great dividend. I just ran the calcs and the net asset value of those shares in that particular holding now represent just 4% of my total holdings, but the dividend represents 15% of my total annual dividend.

This is where I struggle with this type of investing. If I decide I can't stomach this company any longer, I'm not sure I can replace the dividend dollars that this stock currently pays. One is going to have to hope the replacement stock I pick has enough growth in it to make some of that 48% loss back to supplement the lower dividend it'll most likely pay.

Is this a good metric to use (% of total dividend earned vs % of total net asset value)? Or should it be more about Growth and Dividend %s not necessarily about dividend dollars? This is all in my retirement accounts so no tax implications and I do not expect to be pulling money from these accounts any time soon.
All I really update is dividend payouts an any buy/sells. Then I can just pop it open, and see within a few seconds my total return, real gains, yield on cost, etc. it's not perfect, but it tells me the info that most sites I've seen don't.

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
__________________
Albert


My Toy... is actually a 1973 Camaro LT and a '09 HD Dyna.
Reply With Quote