View Single Post
  #8  
Old 03-28-2018, 06:48 PM
rustomatic rustomatic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: ATL
Posts: 748
Thanks: 11
Thanked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Default

I am a big fan of the E39 BMW--I've had two of them. I presently have a 2001 530i, and it's awesome to drive, both near and far. Part of this is due to the car's previous owner, who had the thing very expensively maintained--he actually paid Euro-specific shops (Bay Area prices) to fix/update everything, and it shows. I love the car, as it is quiet, smooth, taut in the right ways, has decent power (225-35 horsies), and looks better than what came before and after (according to me and thousands of others). These cars are available cheap (zillions in CA on Craigslist at all times), but you've got to get a good one (one that had a good life, in other words) that has been owned by non-addled grownups (and not given to their kids).

These cars handle great (I live on a very twisty river road and drive canyons daily), smell okay, and have a nice shape. They have some of the best engineering applied recently or presently to chassis dynamics and weight distribution. They have aluminum subframes front and rear, and the front's got a buttload of caster. I can drool on and on . . . I'd really like to stick an LS in one of these, but smog rules in CA . . .

There are many minor problems that creep up in these things, but most are very cheap to fix (avoiding early/late build cycle models seems to help here--the U.S. range is '98 to /'03). They made more than a million E39s internationally. If you do maintenance and fix things (like window regulators/brakes/etc.), the part costs are quite negligible (my four-wheel brake job with rotors and pads was sub-$150, via eBay). The Web knowledge on these things is ridiculously huge and very helpful.

The straight six is an engine configuration that has not gotten the credit (in recent decades) that it deserves. It is super-smooth, torquey at the right rpms, durable as rocks if properly maintained, and is quite efficient. The smaller of the E39 engines (525/528) will do 27+ mpg in any environment (the 540 has a V8 that should be avoided, from what I've heard). Treat it right, and it's like a gas-powered, German Cummins.

The model after the E39, from what I've seen, should be avoided like hepatitis.

I'll shut up now.

Edit: I forgot about the 1/2JZ. That's the Japanese Cummins (I-6).

Last edited by rustomatic; 03-28-2018 at 06:52 PM.
Reply With Quote