Quote:
Originally Posted by andre68
I already ripped out the decoupled stuff in the rear and switched to a standard 3 link. I've been scanning the entire internet for feedback from people who ACTUALLY run this rear setup. Talked to multiple people, most notably Tony Ave (who has experience with these in Trans Am). He basically said this design isn't as effective as we all think. His words were "braking stability is much better without it" and "weight and handling changes as it wears".
|
I think if you wanted to put in the effort, it could be made to work
slightly better than a standard 3-link only because we use 200 treadwear tires. At the end of the day, I'm not willing to chase setup on a constantly moving target.
Quote:
Originally Posted by andre68
Also found a video of this setup in a customer car, taking a beating. Anyone know who's car that is? Can't imagine many ppl are running it? Curious how it performed, considering the decoupled setup used in past Trans Am cars was wayy bigger and beefier:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=t3LCG7Q9nHo |
That's Ron Ver Mulm's car. Talked with him about the decoupled setup, and he was working with it. He had to change out the lower link compression spring unit with one that had more spring travel and a higher spring rate. He had to send the upper shock back to Advanced Racing Suspension to have it MASSIVELY revalved, from Ron it has like 20lbs. of compression, which is about useless. I'll be scrapping it as well and just running a 3 link designed by Riggin's Engineering.