View Single Post
  #12  
Old 07-01-2019, 01:16 PM
Gscherer78ta's Avatar
Gscherer78ta Gscherer78ta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 157
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carbuff View Post
Greg, interesting data point here. When I dynoed a couple of weeks ago, we did so both with and without my current round filter installed. We removed it after a few pulls since we noticed vacuum in the manifold and wanted to see if it was the filter. It made very little difference. So we did the tuning without it installed and then reinstalled for one last pull. We lost 6HP when reinstalled, but it was also heat soaked, so to me it was little to no loss.

The filter I'm using is a 9 3/4" round 3" tall K&N at the moment just to give you an idea...



I look forward to seeing what you come up with. Keep us posted. I'll get back on my own setup here soon...
What explains the vacuum in the manifold if the restriction isn't the filter. I have been also wondering about the opening size of the shaker scoops. In Bob's case I don't think that's an issue because it's open all the way around. If the only air is coming through that opening, does that choke the flow?
__________________
Greg

'78 Trans Am - Y88-R LS3/T56,
Holley EFI, UMI Performance
Reply With Quote