Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
That pic keep bothering me, I'm calling Haggerty this week to raise my limits.
Steve, are you still working on the insurance article? I think this highly unfortunate learning experience it will at least result in great benefit to the community. That isn’t much of a consolation prize, though.
I know it is way too early to ask, but do you think when all is said & done, could you quantify if the 'modifications' to the car (3-link, etc.) materially (say >20%) inflated those costs? What I mean is, if that were a 'regular' show level fit & finish 68 Camaro, but replacing the cool parts with stock parts (or common aftermarket parts, say TTIIs instead of those works of art you call wheels), would the repair be much less? That is a lot of sheet metal to fix. If that were my car, with my current 10k limit, I’d fear total loss even though it isn't 1/100th of the quality of your car. I think drawing a comparison of the 2 scenarios might be a very eye opening experience for many of us. Just a thought.
Hang in there, she will rise - again! 
|
Yea, I'm pitching the insurance article. I think it would be good info and at least it's not, yet another, cam swap or typical magazine story.
I want to stage up the wrecked Penny for a lead shot, who wouldn't read that? lol
Also, if I do a quarter panel replacement story could I call it "half penny".. lol
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."
See Bad Penny run the cones:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U
1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada
1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS