View Single Post
  #27  
Old 08-10-2011, 10:10 PM
byndbad914's Avatar
byndbad914 byndbad914 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 496
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Default

yep, again, if I had it to do over I would have gone with the 350 crank for a 377, more compression, and a roller cam as well. When I first built it I was worried about transaxles staying together so I cut the torque down. Now that I am a mile high, I could use the extra 24 cubes to get the lost power back (it's a 353 with the 327 crank)
Reply With Quote