I agree with Greg.
I ran Rhoads lifters back in the 70's & 80's on street engines we built to build a wider powerband into the engine. The lifter low-rpm bleed off allowed you to run a bigger duration cam. At Idle, the lifters bleed off so much, the engine effectively had much less cam duration. This bleed off reduced as you revved the engine up to 3000 RPM & after that acted just like a regular hydraulic lifter ... so the bigger duration built more power up top. They worked very well & were a nice little trick to broaden the powerband.
Technology today has surpassed that. The hydraulic roller lifters allow for much steeper camshaft ramp angles than can be run with conventional "Flat/Sharp Edge" solid or hydraulic lifters. So now, the duration can be small for bottom end ... but the steeper ramps allow for much more area under the lift curve ... so more power in the mid to upper RPM range ... even with shorter duration numbers.
You could say both of these strategies do the same thing, but different ways. But in reality, the gains from the hydraulic roller lifter far outweigh the gains from the Rhoads variable duration hydraulic lifter.
.