...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Race Cars and Modern Pro-Street
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2016, 11:19 PM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,705
Thanks: 59
Thanked 62 Times in 20 Posts
Default Not a Torino Not an FE

Working backwards from the last track day out.

Here is nothing special but a race car none the less and one I ended up rebuilding.

Out of the trailer





One of us is taking the wrong line

You guess who





I learned you Can NOT out accelerate a 911 Turbo with 340 rwhp no matter how much weight you have stripped out of your car.



But not all P car drivers are Pr#@*s



I learned Sonoma is a challenging track that is a hell of a lot of fun to drive.




And as always I was reminded good friends at the track make the day.

Thanks for the pics Siegmiester.

More details on the car to follow, maybe.
__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171


Last edited by FETorino; 12-10-2017 at 02:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2016, 04:24 PM
DBasher's Avatar
DBasher DBasher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 1,890
Thanks: 180
Thanked 186 Times in 57 Posts
Default

I want more details...I know it's an old Bondurant car and than an AI before you got it, how far from stock is it? This car and this event is what got me looking at these and older fox bodies.
Spill the beans!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-2016, 10:36 PM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,705
Thanks: 59
Thanked 62 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBasher View Post
I want more details...I know it's an old Bondurant car and than an AI before you got it, how far from stock is it? This car and this event is what got me looking at these and older fox bodies.
Spill the beans!
I wish it was a Fox body those have way more style.

It's a 99-04 Wedge but the platform is pretty much the same, and the formula for a cheap track car is also.

My car has always been a track car. Back in the day it was a Bonduraunt car then it was updated to compete back east in SCCA and then in Texas as an AI car.

I bought it with a worn out motor and the basic suspension set up and then ended up doing a but load of work bringing it up to it's current spec.

It is nothing fancy but it works well as a track mule and is class legal for NASA AI so I can race it in the series.

Any early Mustang can use the same simple formula to be a competent track car.

Bolt on Maximum Motorsports crossmember, lower control arms with camber caster plates on the front. Coilover strut conversion on all four corners. Plain yellow Bilstien HD struts and shocks. Mine has an old Bonduraunt torque arm in the rear but a Maximum Motorsports torque arm would be the choice. and of course a Panhard bar.

The brakes on it now are 13" Stoptechs up front and stock GT brakes out back. Hawk DT70s front and rear but if you didn't have Aero in the rear then runs 60s out back.

The Aero is some no name wing out back with some big end plates I added, a home made splitter up front with blocked off radiator opening breathing just from the lower opening and some track spec hood vents.

The class limits you to an 18x9.5" wheel and a 275 35 18 Toyo tire so that is what I run. High dollar CL Enkei RA1s on all four corners.

For power in the class you can run any Ford in any Ford or any Chevy in any Chevy ect... Mine is based on a 4.6 2v. I fragged the block and then found a Ford Motorsports boss block with 94mm bores so mine is now a 2v 5.0 mod motor. The class limit is 9.25lb of car per hp (if you have antilock brakes) so my motor is built to get me to a legal 340hp. Heads are ported, headers and intake and better throttle body cams and a tune on the PCM.

I would buy one with a Windsor based motor if I did it again. Cheaper and lighter.

The transmission is a stock T45 with a Findanzia AL flywheel and a Excedy puck style clutch. Out back I have a 3.50 torsion diff 8.8. I wish it was a 3.70 but that's what it had.

The car weighs about 3300lbs with me in it.

You saw it run at Sonoma. I had never been on that track before but the car works well enough to run some decent lap times. It is pretty fun to wrestle around a track.

I would say it is a great platform to get you out on track. It works well enough yet it isn't perfect so it makes you drive and it has a pretty good fun factor for the $$.
__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171


Last edited by FETorino; 12-03-2016 at 10:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-04-2016, 12:13 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,650
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,065 Times in 373 Posts
Default

We did have a lot of fun at Sonoma!!!


Awesome car!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-04-2016, 12:48 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,107
Thanks: 49
Thanked 137 Times in 88 Posts
Default

Fox FTW
__________________
1968 Camaro SB2.2
2004 Mustang LS2
2014 Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-04-2016, 04:13 PM
rustomatic rustomatic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: ATL
Posts: 724
Thanks: 11
Thanked 48 Times in 28 Posts
Default

That's good info, and Sonoma is indeed the awesome track--I can't wait to get back on it. I think a big part of what makes it so cool is that it really embodies the shape and quality of a lot of the good roads in northern CA (and other places), like the one I live on . . .

I drove a '92 Fox-body that had the full Maximum Motorsports kit on it, with drag radials, from South Carolina to CA, and I was really impressed with how it worked (while not compromising ride quality or submitting bad NVH). Another cool thing about the MM stuff is how it's priced so much better than a lot of competing bolt-on stuff out there (and we know it works) . . .

I'm betting that the only time that 340 hp really becomes evident as slightly less than you want is on straights, like at Thunderhill. Most of the time, it's probably quite sufficient.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-25-2017, 11:32 PM
DBasher's Avatar
DBasher DBasher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 1,890
Thanks: 180
Thanked 186 Times in 57 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash68 View Post
Fox FTW
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-15-2017, 08:25 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,107
Thanks: 49
Thanked 137 Times in 88 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post


Awesome car!
I voted for the Fox body.
__________________
1968 Camaro SB2.2
2004 Mustang LS2
2014 Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-15-2017, 08:26 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,650
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,065 Times in 373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash68 View Post
I voted for the Fox body.



I was talking about the 'Vette.....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net