...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-15-2011, 02:21 PM
BANKO's Avatar
BANKO BANKO is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 230
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Watts Link & Wheel Opening

Nice & tight packaging of the Watts linkage setup. How how much bell crank travel / lateral housing movement is designed in?



The stance is killer! Any plans to stretch the rear wheel openings?

__________________
Josh

Designing a '65 Chevelle with a StreetFighter theme, inspired by JP's II Much & Ron Schwarz's $5k Mustang
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-15-2011, 07:33 PM
tones2SS's Avatar
tones2SS tones2SS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8,150
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS-Perf View Post
A few pics of the body on the chassis sitting at ride height.
That is just NASTY! Killer work guys.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-15-2011, 09:35 PM
Roadster Shop's Avatar
Roadster Shop Roadster Shop is offline
Supporting Vendor

RoadsterShop.com

 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryce View Post
Great looking project.

I know there has been lots of discussion on chassis vs axle mounted watts bellcrank, but why did you decide to do it that way?
In a perfect world I feel a chassis mounted bell crank would be the ideal setup, mounting the bell crank in a fixed position to the chassis would allow the rear roll center to move up and down as the suspension goes through its travel. With the bell crank fixed to the rear end housing you do not get the same roll center movement, yet I still feel there are performance improvements over a conventional panhard bar. We offer them in both configurations but due to packaging issues we built this particular car with the pivot fixed to the rear end housing.
__________________
www.roadstershop.com
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-16-2011, 08:46 AM
RPM HOTRODS's Avatar
RPM HOTRODS RPM HOTRODS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Boy, I can almost see it finished!!!! As always, killer work guys. Can't wait to see it at Columbus!!!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-16-2011, 08:43 PM
Roadster Shop's Avatar
Roadster Shop Roadster Shop is offline
Supporting Vendor

RoadsterShop.com

 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Some more progress on the floors of the car









__________________
www.roadstershop.com
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-16-2011, 08:50 PM
kwhizz's Avatar
kwhizz kwhizz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kenosha , wi
Posts: 1,095
Thanks: 639
Thanked 411 Times in 158 Posts
Default

Wow!!.......Great Job!!!

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-17-2011, 08:35 AM
Bryce Bryce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS-Perf View Post
In a perfect world I feel a chassis mounted bell crank would be the ideal setup, mounting the bell crank in a fixed position to the chassis would allow the rear roll center to move up and down as the suspension goes through its travel. With the bell crank fixed to the rear end housing you do not get the same roll center movement, yet I still feel there are performance improvements over a conventional panhard bar. We offer them in both configurations but due to packaging issues we built this particular car with the pivot fixed to the rear end housing.
Thank you for the answer.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-19-2011, 09:51 AM
Sinco Sinco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: La Habra Hts. CA
Posts: 122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Sick!!!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-20-2011, 01:56 PM
Roadster Shop's Avatar
Roadster Shop Roadster Shop is offline
Supporting Vendor

RoadsterShop.com

 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

In order to get the look and stance that we were after, we altered the wheel base and moved the rear wheels back 1.5". (This was done from the start in the chassis design.) Here are the wheel houses fabbed to clear the 20x12's the Innovator will be running out back.









__________________
www.roadstershop.com
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-20-2011, 02:01 PM
Al Moreno Al Moreno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,498
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I got the latest issue of Popular Hotroding and saw the progress shot. This car is going to be AWESOME! I loved the head light treatment, the engine carpartment, etc........

Can you post the rending pic and interior pics?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net