|
03-08-2021, 05:41 AM
|
|
Lateral-g Supporting Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 28
Thanked 1,845 Times in 504 Posts
|
|
Camaro LT5
For what it is worth we chassis dyno-ed my car on Friday. 812 HP to the tires. On winter blend 93 octane fuel.
I have put 200 miles on the car so far and did get a chance to stand on it yesterday. First off it is sketchy fast on 32 degree tires. With less torque than the 427 engines it is a bit easier to pedal to keep straight.
The high boost 6.2 liter sounds different from the lower boost 7.0 liter. It revs quickly and hits hard. My un-scientific test of a sprint to 150 mph this car is on pair with my past projects. (Of course closed course it a professional driver).
On the prototype mufflers that we had made. They are LOUD. Like squirrel dropping out of tree loud. Like setting of my neighbors car alarms LOUD. You know LOUD. On a positive note it has a very deep note at idle.
I will get Hooker to redesign the mufflers and add resonators. We are doing a little R&D for Hooker Black heart.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Stielow For This Useful Post:
|
130fe (03-09-2021), camcojb (03-08-2021), dhutton (03-08-2021), EVIL SS (03-08-2021), fleetus macmullitz (03-08-2021), RdHuggr68 (03-08-2021), Rodknock (03-08-2021), Spiffav8 (03-09-2021), syborg tt (03-08-2021), TimeWarpF100 (03-11-2021), will69camaro (03-08-2021) |
03-08-2021, 05:50 AM
|
|
Lateral-g Supporting Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 28
Thanked 1,845 Times in 504 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnUlaszek
Mark,
Overflow isn’t needed, but just one vent on the filler neck and one on the body of the tank, both lines should meet at a T fitting and then a single line up to the IIMUCH VSB.
|
Been there tried that. We added a 1 quart over flow tank in the trunk. It is the way highest point in the system. Then we vent off the top of that to the Too Much canister.
I’m sick and tired of the fuel puking out. It seems to work great. I fully filled my tank with very cold fuel and then parked it in my heated garage. No fuel smell and no signs of over flow.
Done. Fixed it. I hope. We will find out this summer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Stielow For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2021, 07:37 PM
|
|
Lateral-g Supporting Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 28
Thanked 1,845 Times in 504 Posts
|
|
Ok I have 200 miles on Apex now. Getting some bugs worked out.
Clutch is working smoother. Katech has the cal closer. Car hits the tires fairly hard.
Low effort burn out. On a 60 degree MI day it seemed like the thing to do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Stielow For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2021, 09:14 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 916
Thanks: 0
Thanked 87 Times in 34 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stielow
The Tilton is dead quite with the clutch pushed in. The pedal force is about the same as the DYAD. The launch is smooth and chatter free most times. If you lug it and don’t give the engine a few revs it can chatter a small amount. If adapted my launches a little and add 500 rpm and it is smooth.
So far the hi rpm reserve is very good. I have not tracked it yet but form the little bit I have drove it I like it. (I only have 200 miles on the car).
DYAD 7.25/10 rating. Negative rattles at idle when it has some miles on it. It too can chatter sometimes. Need a custom throw out bearing. Great high rpm reserve. Work awesome on the track. No issues.
Tilton 8/10 rating Does not rattle at idle. Does not need a special throw out bearing. Had a small chatter at a very soft launch. I have not tracked it yet.
Mark
|
Good info, thanks. The Tilton sounds very promising, and at a reasonable price too. Look forward to more info after you get more miles on it. You went with the organic discs and not the cerametallic discs, correct?
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.
Last edited by Blown353; 03-12-2021 at 11:06 AM.
|
03-09-2021, 06:21 AM
|
|
Lateral-g Supporting Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 233
Thanks: 2
Thanked 25 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Looking good...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stielow
Ok I have 200 miles on Apex now. Getting some bugs worked out.
Clutch is working smoother. Katech has the cal closer. Car hits the tires fairly hard.
Low effort burn out. On a 60 degree MI day it seemed like the thing to do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Mark, It never get's old. The perfect stress reliever...
|
03-10-2021, 10:03 AM
|
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 66
Thanks: 1
Thanked 23 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stielow
The Ricks tank has a vent system inside the tank to help. We also add a fitting to the filler neck to help prevent fuel from pushing out of the tank. With all of that said if you 100% fill the tank on a hot day then park the car in the hot sun it might puke over out the 2 Much canister.
The issue is the Ricks tanks and most aftermarket tanks do not have room for expansion.
This one of the only issues we had with Charlies new Riv.
The 2 Much canisters do a great job with fuel vapors but no pure fuel.
I may add an expansion tank to the project before the 2 Much canister to keep raw fuel out of it.
Thanks for the comment I almost forgot about that.
Mark
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
I’m going to humbly disagree with Mark. The older version of the Rick’s tank uses an internal manifold/tube which may cause the tank to pressurize and push liquid fuel out of the vent port when full . The internal vent tube seems to act like a straw that can submerge the vent port in fuel when the tank is full. Newer Rick’s tanks appear to have abandoned the internal manifold and switched to a two port design. A port on the filler neck and one strategically placed on the tank running to a T and then to the VSB or VSR has worked well for many II MUCH customers even in road race applications.
The Riveria also had the internal manifold design, and overflowed as I predicted in conversation with Sled Alley after I saw a picture of the tank on the build thread.
If you scroll to @motobrewmaster ‘s post in this thread you can see one of the older Rick’s tanks modified as described — he plugged the original port location on the front of the tank and added three new ports. Three is probably overkill but certainly can’t hurt.
https://www.pro-touring.com/threads/...37#post1353237
That said, Mark took a sledgehammer to the problem and is happy with how things are working for him. I’m happy to continue this discussion with anybody that is interested privately.
Last edited by JohnUlaszek; 03-10-2021 at 11:57 AM.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JohnUlaszek For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-10-2021, 03:40 PM
|
|
Lateral-g Supporting Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 28
Thanked 1,845 Times in 504 Posts
|
|
Next stop Scottsdale AZ for the Barrett Jackson Cup car show.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Stielow For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-10-2021, 09:19 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 336
Thanks: 4
Thanked 42 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Good thing Charlie hates white or he'd probably keep it in AZ.
|
03-10-2021, 09:48 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 72
Thanked 337 Times in 211 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stielow
Next stop Scottsdale AZ for the Barrett Jackson Cup car show.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Hmmm... I need to look this event up, see if I can make it over to the East Valley for it.
__________________
Lance
1985 Monte Carlo SS Street Car
|
03-10-2021, 10:19 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Agree. On my older ricks tank with the tube I had overflowing issues and my overflow would hose fuel. With my new ricks tank and 10 or 11 gallons of gas I have zero issues
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnUlaszek
I’m going to humbly disagree with Mark. The older version of the Rick’s tank uses an internal manifold/tube which may cause the tank to pressurize and push liquid fuel out of the vent port when full . The internal vent tube seems to act like a straw that can submerge the vent port in fuel when the tank is full. Newer Rick’s tanks appear to have abandoned the internal manifold and switched to a two port design. A port on the filler neck and one strategically placed on the tank running to a T and then to the VSB or VSR has worked well for many II MUCH customers even in road race applications.
The Riveria also had the internal manifold design, and overflowed as I predicted in conversation with Sled Alley after I saw a picture of the tank on the build thread.
If you scroll to @motobrewmaster ‘s post in this thread you can see one of the older Rick’s tanks modified as described — he plugged the original port location on the front of the tank and added three new ports. Three is probably overkill but certainly can’t hurt.
https://www.pro-touring.com/threads/...37#post1353237
That said, Mark took a sledgehammer to the problem and is happy with how things are working for him. I’m happy to continue this discussion with anybody that is interested privately.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.
|