...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



View Poll Results: Which one would you choose and why?
Alterkation front with Lateral Dynamics rear (does not use panhard bar) 12 60.00%
XV Level II front with XV Level II rear (does use panhard bar) 8 40.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-09-2007, 04:00 AM
deuce_454's Avatar
deuce_454 deuce_454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,612
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver69Camaro
I differ from this opinion. A well-designed panhard bar can work extremely well, and does not suffer from the usual drawbacks of a watts (complexity, cost, weight, and exhaust room).
in your case i can see why youŽd object.. but or your chassis (AM) the roll-center in the rear is so well controlled and low set with the rear UCAŽs mounted where they are.. but when upgrading anything on a car my philposophy has always been to get it as good in the first go as is possible...

and the point of exhaust room on a cuda -that with a fair degree of certainty will have exhaust exiting before the rear wheels... isnt a sure seller.
__________________
Elwood:We're 105 miles from Chicago, we have a full tank of gas, half pack of cigarettes, it's dark out and we're wearing sunglasses.
Jake: Hit it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-09-2007, 04:35 AM
JohnC JohnC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 420
Thanks: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowtieracing
No with XV i wouldn think of an second to to choose their stuff.
What??
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-09-2007, 04:44 AM
JohnC JohnC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 420
Thanks: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deuce_454
my philposophy has always been to get it as good in the first go as is possible...
my philosophy as well...



Quote:
Originally Posted by deuce_454
and the point of exhaust room on a cuda -that with a fair degree of certainty will have exhaust exiting before the rear wheels... isnt a sure seller.
I kind of wanted to use the lower rear facia with exhaust thru it...Is that going to be possible with the Lateral Dynamics stuff??? They say you can, but I have not seen a LD car yet the rear exiting exhaust....
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-09-2007, 05:21 AM
Bowtieracing Bowtieracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,914
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnC
What??

Once again and slowly....

Now when we have XV motorsport on market i would choose their stuff over everything i have heard or seen sofar. I believe they have invested a lot for testing and R&D of their products.

Got it ?
__________________
63 Z06
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-09-2007, 07:55 AM
JohnC JohnC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 420
Thanks: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowtieracing
Once again and slowly....

Now when we have XV motorsport on market i would choose their stuff over everything i have heard or seen sofar. I believe they have invested a lot for testing and R&D of their products.

Got it ?
Ok, that makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-09-2007, 08:31 AM
Bowtieracing Bowtieracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,914
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnC
Ok, that makes sense.

I sometimes do type faster than i think
__________________
63 Z06
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-10-2007, 11:41 AM
James OLC's Avatar
James OLC James OLC is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,458
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnC
I kind of wanted to use the lower rear facia with exhaust thru it...Is that going to be possible with the Lateral Dynamics stuff??? They say you can, but I have not seen a LD car yet the rear exiting exhaust....
I had no issue running a complete mandrel bent 3" exhaust system exiting at the back of the car with the Lateral Dynamics 3-Link. The rear crossmember is even notched for clearance. Steve Rupp is likewise running a full exhaust system. It's not much more difficult with the LD setup than any other rear suspension.
__________________
James
1967 Camaro RS - The OLC
1967 Camaro RS - Recycler
1969 Camaro - Dusty

Last edited by James OLC; 11-10-2007 at 11:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-10-2007, 12:17 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,533
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reboot04
I had no issue running a complete mandrel bent 3" exhaust system exiting at the back of the car with the Lateral Dynamics 3-Link. The rear crossmember is even notched for clearance. Steve Rupp is likewise running a full exhaust system. It's not much more difficult with the LD setup than any other rear suspension.
Yea, I could have ran 3-inch if had wanted to but the 2.5 was perfect for the size of my engine.

There's plenty of room if the exhaust fabricator has some talent.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-10-2007, 12:20 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,533
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnC
They say you can, but I have not seen a LD car yet the rear exiting exhaust....
You can't say that any longer..

__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-10-2007, 02:38 PM
Mean 69 Mean 69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 375
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all of the kind words guys, and the interest from all of you. I owe the thread a response, and I will get to it hopefully before the weekend is over with some relevent info. No time to type more right now.

Cheers,
Mark
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net