...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Transmission and Rear End
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-15-2024, 01:47 PM
cpd004's Avatar
cpd004 cpd004 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 343
Thanks: 122
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Default Driveline angle questions with Speedtech components

I have a 71 Firebird with Extreme front sub frame. It has an Ls3 and 4L60e.

I recently had some issues with the original 10 bolt and ended up getting one of their 9" axles.

The rear has their torque arm setup.

There is no way at all to measure the bearing cap of the front U joint as Spicer suggests. Best I could do was at the harmonic balancer face as they list in their Mopar instructions I happened to come across.

I am using a Klein digital angle finder. It is a small square device.

At the balancer, I see 2.8 degrees down. There are several shims between the trans and the trans mount. There is no room to go any higher at the tail of the trans if that's what is needed.

The driveshaft actually runs upward at 1.0 degree.

The center section has approximately 4 washers as shim and runs upward at 1.1 degree.

Their instructions at section 4 on page 20 ( https://speedtechperformance.com/wp-...rm-20300-1.pdf ) say this:

Pinion angle should be within range at the ride height as stated above. If you feel a drive shaft vibration at
speed, you may need to adjust your driveline working angle. We have found this to be at optimum on our
ExtReme products between 1.5-2 degrees. Use shims on either the rear pinion mount as seen in the diagram
70-81 F-Body Torque Arm Page 21
below or at the transmission crossmember until you have the correct angle and any driveline vibrations should
go away.
We have found that in all our installs we have not need to adjust the pinion as it is engineered into the mounts



Not sure how they don't find a need to run them at the center between that mount and the torque arm because mine would point down without these washers.

That would both the trans and center pointing downward. Many websites say this is not acceptable.

I do have an email out to them. The initial email mentioned removing shims at the trans. This doesn't seem correct at all.

I do have the old subframe setup with the very thin tube trans crossmember. Not sure if this has anything to do with anything, but like I said, I can't go any higher with the trans to reduce that downward slope.
__________________
1971 Firebird
2017 SS
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-15-2024, 04:14 PM
srode1 srode1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 190
Thanks: 161
Thanked 71 Times in 50 Posts
Default

I would call them - they are very responsive every time I have called with a question. It's a lot easier and faster to have a conversation than back and forth emails.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to srode1 For This Useful Post:
cpd004 (02-16-2024)
  #3  
Old 02-16-2024, 07:53 AM
dontlifttoshift's Avatar
dontlifttoshift dontlifttoshift is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Beach Park. IL
Posts: 959
Thanks: 16
Thanked 175 Times in 103 Posts
Default

Can you clarify this?

Quote:
The driveshaft actually runs upward at 1.0 degree.
Actually, if you clarified all of your angle measurements as either up or down in the rear it would ensure accurate math. I am assuming that these measurements are taken with the rear suspension loaded.

If the driveshaft is running uphill to the rear end, your working angles are 2.1* in the rear and 3.8* in the front.
__________________
Donny

Support your local hot rod shop!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dontlifttoshift For This Useful Post:
camcojb (02-16-2024), cpd004 (02-17-2024)
  #4  
Old 02-17-2024, 03:53 PM
cpd004's Avatar
cpd004 cpd004 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 343
Thanks: 122
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Had a little bit of time to try again. The car is on its wheels which are on the 2x4 cribbing that are homemade and then those on rolling dollies. The car has been bounced around on these to hopefully settle it as much as possible. It appears as though it's at ride height but elevated.

Took out the shims at the back between the pinion mount and torque arm.

So this is what I am seeing:

At the crank hub = 3.0 degrees down

Driveshaft = 0.9 degrees up

Center section = 0.9 degrees up

If I'm understanding this correctly now, 3.0 + 0.9 = 3.9 for working angle 1

0.9 - 0.9 = 0.0 for angle 2

So this is far from their 1.5 to 2 degree no noise/vibration suggestion. The zero at the rear is not acceptable at all. The rear can be rotated.

The options I have are to go lower at the trans increasing the downward slope and/or going up at the pinion. A lot would have to be reworked to lift the trans and reduce the slope there.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something.

The reason I began looking into this is that I have a weird harmonic sound that seems like it comes from the driveshaft off throttle as it coasts down while testing it. The center section builder immediately asked about driveline angles. So looking them over is where I am.
__________________
1971 Firebird
2017 SS

Last edited by cpd004; 02-18-2024 at 03:39 PM. Reason: Mistake in slope
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-19-2024, 07:59 AM
dontlifttoshift's Avatar
dontlifttoshift dontlifttoshift is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Beach Park. IL
Posts: 959
Thanks: 16
Thanked 175 Times in 103 Posts
Default

Based on that information, you're math is correct.

If you roll the pinion down, working angle at the trans becomes less and working angle at the pinion becomes more.

If you go up on the pinion, angle at the trans is just going to get worse.
__________________
Donny

Support your local hot rod shop!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dontlifttoshift For This Useful Post:
camcojb (02-19-2024), cpd004 (02-19-2024)
  #6  
Old 02-19-2024, 08:05 AM
dhutton dhutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mountain Springs, Texas
Posts: 1,889
Thanks: 1,072
Thanked 480 Times in 264 Posts
Default

I could be wrong but I think you either need to raise the transmission or increase your ride height.

Don
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dhutton For This Useful Post:
camcojb (02-19-2024), cpd004 (02-19-2024)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net