...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-31-2010, 09:39 PM
AWDPete's Avatar
AWDPete AWDPete is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Baraboo, WI
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the input Vince

Sounds like a good plan, so who's arms would make your "top 3" list?

Was looking at Afco coilovers, good/bad?

While I think I will ultimately end up with an LS motor the BB will have to do for now. How much less does the LS motor weight? I was thinking the L92 or LS3 would be the way to go with the alloy block but I'm sure an iron block motor would work just as well with a little more wieght, I wonder how much more........
__________________
PeteH
Baraboo, WI

https://lateral-g.net/forums/gara...vehicle&id=121
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-31-2010, 10:37 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,663
Thanks: 86
Thanked 210 Times in 119 Posts
Default

You don't need to lose the big block. The low end torque is ideal for autocross and road racing. With aluminum heads, radiator, battery in the trunk, you are in small block territory anyway. I've raced my car with a steel block and now ZL-1 aluminum block. It doesn't make that much difference. Honing in your chassis and your skills will make a much greater difference. LSX this, LSX that.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-01-2010, 07:23 AM
AWDPete's Avatar
AWDPete AWDPete is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Baraboo, WI
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Todd

While the BB is staying for now it's not very streetable. I built it with intensions of drag racing so it's got 12.5:1 compression a really lumpy cam, Holley Strip Dominator intake and 850cfm dp. It ain't a pump gas motor! It's also got a deep oil pan with little baffling. The heads are early GM aluminum closed chamber with LOTS of work done on the exhaust ports BUT it wasn't built for unleaded fuel. And it's a baby at only 402ci.

While I haven't crunched the numbers as to what it would cost to make this thing live on pump gas I have a feeling it may be close to a used LS motor. While I know It would cost more to install, the EFI would be very welcome. Our fearless leader Scott told me he knocked down 22mpg with his modded LS7 - I don't think that is possible with a BB? Bottom line is I want to USE the thing!
__________________
PeteH
Baraboo, WI

https://lateral-g.net/forums/gara...vehicle&id=121

Last edited by AWDPete; 06-01-2010 at 07:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-01-2010, 07:44 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AWDPete View Post
Scott told me he knocked down 22mpg with his modded LS7 - I don't think that is possible with a BB?
I get about 24mpg on the highway, but I could probably get better.
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-01-2010, 07:54 AM
AWDPete's Avatar
AWDPete AWDPete is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Baraboo, WI
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

24mpg that's what I get with my daily driver! Nice

What are you running for rear-end gears, didn't see it mentioned in the Camaro Performers article?
__________________
PeteH
Baraboo, WI

https://lateral-g.net/forums/gara...vehicle&id=121

Last edited by AWDPete; 06-01-2010 at 08:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-01-2010, 09:25 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,663
Thanks: 86
Thanked 210 Times in 119 Posts
Default

That's a different story. There is no doubt the LSX is the most economical option. I thought you had a decent street power plant.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-01-2010, 11:44 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AWDPete View Post
24mpg that's what I get with my daily driver! Nice

What are you running for rear-end gears, didn't see it mentioned in the Camaro Performers article?
I'm running 3.70's. I'm pretty happy with that setup with a 26" tire.
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-01-2010, 01:44 PM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I would be very carefull full welding the seams on the subframe. Heat will warp the you know what out of it, and it will provide very little benefit except looking cool all smoothed. If you do weld it up solid, do it in stiches 1 to 2 inch at a time and bounce from side to side to allow cooling beween welds.

As for mods, IF your using aftermarket control arms a simple re drill of the upper control arm mounting holes on the subframe below the factory holes will improve you camber gain. And a set of geometry corrected control arms will increase caster.

A good set of coil springs like Hotchkis, some good shocks (Hotchkis are great NON adjustable on a budget, A hollow sway bar (Hotchkis again) and a 600 steering gear, some tie rod stiffeners, and you have a really nice frame for $2500!
__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-01-2010, 02:53 PM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProdigyCustoms View Post
I would be very carefull full welding the seams on the subframe. Heat will warp the you know what out of it, and it will provide very little benefit except looking cool all smoothed. If you do weld it up solid, do it in stiches 1 to 2 inch at a time and bounce from side to side to allow cooling beween welds.

As for mods, IF your using aftermarket control arms a simple re drill of the upper control arm mounting holes on the subframe below the factory holes will improve you camber gain. And a set of geometry corrected control arms will increase caster.

A good set of coil springs like Hotchkis, some good shocks (Hotchkis are great NON adjustable on a budget, A hollow sway bar (Hotchkis again) and a 600 steering gear, some tie rod stiffeners, and you have a really nice frame for $2500!
All great advice. Also, instead of relocating the upper control arm mounting holes (the Guldstrand mod), you can use either tall spindles (not drop tall spindles) or tall ball joints.
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-01-2010, 03:43 PM
AWDPete's Avatar
AWDPete AWDPete is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Baraboo, WI
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProdigyCustoms View Post
I would be very carefull full welding the seams on the subframe. Heat will warp the you know what out of it, and it will provide very little benefit except looking cool all smoothed. If you do weld it up solid, do it in stiches 1 to 2 inch at a time and bounce from side to side to allow cooling beween welds.
Understood, I've made some wavy stuff before Do you think it would be worth the trouble of pulling a finished car apart to do this mod - well, I suppose I could do 75% of it without pulling the subframe? I was also thinking about some forward struts to help stiffen the front - worth the trouble?

Quote:
As for mods, IF your using aftermarket control arms a simple re drill of the upper control arm mounting holes on the subframe below the factory holes will improve you camber gain. And a set of geometry corrected control arms will increase caster.
My only question here is who's arms are "geometry corrected"? The actual changes made by the various aftermarket arm builders seems to be a secret! They list the material they are made of, which bushings and balljoints they use but they don't specifically list what the change in geometry will be (did I miss it somewhere?). Reading many other posts in this forum it seems you would be the man to ask

Quote:
A good set of coil springs like Hotchkis, some good shocks (Hotchkis are great NON adjustable on a budget, A hollow sway bar (Hotchkis again) and a 600 steering gear, some tie rod stiffeners, and you have a really nice frame for $2500!
That all sounds good. So you recommend the 600 box over a rack?
__________________
PeteH
Baraboo, WI

https://lateral-g.net/forums/gara...vehicle&id=121
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net