| Steve Chryssos |
06-26-2009 08:33 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by XLexusTech
(Post 220278)
Thanks Steve. So if you were trying to Monday morniing QB how would you weigh tires (100 vs 200 vs 300 ) aginst HP say 600 agains 450?
What I mean is the top 10 numbers look really close. The top Dog had 150 or more HP then everyone else but ran on harder tires.
Thanks for the educated guess :thumbsup:
|
You can't. That perfect scenario of big power PLUS R-Compound tires PLUS experience did not materialize at the 2009 Motor State Classic. Could Jake Parrot have won with 150 more HP? Could Ryan Matthews or Mark Stielow have run a 1.33 on R-Compounds? Coulda, woulda, shoulda.
Furthermore, the posted numbers do not reflect mechanical maladies either. Could Kyle Tucker have won if his battery mount did not fail? Could David Pozzi have won if his brakes were not toasted? Kyle's best lap time was a 1.36, Pozzi's was a 1.39, so you can poo-poo the data, but the Shootout was a different deal. Drivers were really pushing their cars in a manner previously unseen in pro-touring. Both cars could have picked up big time. I think it's awesome that all of the participants respected the fact that the Shootout was the race. You don't win a race in warm up or qualifying. Coulda, woulda, shoulda.
There are only three consistently recurring themes amongst the field:
1) Driver Experience
2) Driver Experience, and
3) Driver Experience
I, for one, am fresh out of excuses. My R888's are insanely awesome. My new Jake's Rod Shop Torque Arm is insanely awesome. Time to fix the driver.
|