Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Engine (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   427 cid 800hp n/a LT-5 build (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=50045)

fleetus macmullitz 04-30-2015 06:57 AM

427 cid 800hp n/a LT-5 build
 
Saw it here...

http://www.zr1.net/forum/showthread.php?t=24966

DavidBoren 04-30-2015 08:28 AM

Thanks for sharing that.

Those Corvette Lotus engines are neat. I like how the guy building it said that it costs "cubic dollars" to upgrade an LT-5.

Did the LT-5 have a flat plane crank? I don't think it did, but I'm not sure.

fleetus macmullitz 04-30-2015 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DavidBoren (Post 604115)
Thanks for sharing that.

Those Corvette Lotus engines are neat. I like how the guy building it said that it costs "cubic dollars" to upgrade an LT-5.

Did the LT-5 have a flat plane crank? I don't think it did, but I'm not sure.

David,

Although it wasn't a flat plane crank, there was a racing LT-5 or 2 that was built with a flat plane crank. Might have been 5.0L versions.

Flash68 04-30-2015 03:36 PM

You know I love it Skipper! :thumbsup:

fleetus macmullitz 04-30-2015 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 604166)
You know I love it Skipper! :thumbsup:

800 hp n/a SB2's and LT-5's...I guess that could give those FE guys something to dream about.

:guns:


lol

WSSix 04-30-2015 07:30 PM

That's amazing! I had no idea you could build an LT5 to that power level.

fleetus macmullitz 04-30-2015 08:54 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by WSSix (Post 604217)
That's amazing! I had no idea you could build an LT5 to that power level.

Plus they look amazing too, especially with the siamesed plenum mod.

Solid LT1 05-02-2015 01:32 AM

Those motors weight about the same as a cast iron big block....wouldn't touch one with a 10ft pole....starter motor is under the intake manifold....British engineering at its finest!

DavidBoren 05-05-2015 02:07 PM

I am just a huge proponent of having overhead valves with one cam to rule them all. That's just personal preference, though.

I do find it quite funny that the LT-5 is what GM produced in the 90's when they decided to see what overhead cams had to offer. And it made 400hp back in 1993-ish. It took Ford until 2011 to make a 400hp dohc naturally aspirated motor.

I am glad that GM stuck the cam back in the block where it belongs... I think that the choice to build the LS motors versus pursuing the dohc design has more than proven to be the right move.

uxojerry 06-20-2015 11:11 AM

The LT5 was built mostly by Mercury Marine and is viewed by many as an outstanding design. Gm couldn't machine the parts to the tolerances required and farmed the work out to Mercury. It was discontinued because of cost and not because it was flawed. Same story with the Northstar, 32 valve V8 built by Cadillac. Great engines but discontinued due to cost.

I like 2 valve motors because they are small, powerful engines and look good on an engine stand. I almost put one in my living room, lol. Take a look at a Coyote on an engine stand, it is big, top heavy, and ugly. The Coyote does sound great when it's having the snot wrung out of it.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net