View Single Post
  #6  
Old 05-31-2005, 09:55 PM
Blown353 Blown353 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 925
Thanks: 0
Thanked 88 Times in 34 Posts
Default

I'm in the opposite camp-- If you have no header clearance issues, run a mechanical clutch with good quality heim joints everywhere. Just as smooth as a hydraulic clutch, cheaper, and with less chances of something leaking brake fluid and eating your paint.

Personally, after putting the heim joint clutch linkage in my car, I'd only run a hydraulic setup if there are header clearance issues. My linkage is extremely smooth! I also like how an all-mechanical setup transmits a bit more "pedal feedback" about the clutch take-up and what is going on. Although, the hydraulic setup allows for easy tailoring of clutch pedal throw/weight by altering the MC bore size. You can do the same by adjusting the pivot points on a mechanical setup, but you need to double check everything to make sure you don't go over-center at some point and "stick" the linkage down.

However, a good hydraulic setup will work just fine and knowing you have a BBC in that Camaro makes me think hydraulic will be the easiest way to go. It would probably be tough to snake a Z-bar and all the linkage around the headers in a BBC camaro. Also, AFAIK that 502 doesn't have the provision on the block for a clutch pivot ball.

As far as a scattershield, McLeod all the way with Moroso offset dowels if you need them.

I also recommend McLeod for the clutch and flywheel. Very happy with my Dual Performance and billet flywheel.
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.

Last edited by Blown353; 05-31-2005 at 10:00 PM.
Reply With Quote