Quote:
Originally Posted by skatinjay27
im not saying its crap im not even here to bash them... for me its just gonna take a lot more than someone "saying" thier all about function,and fancy marketing phrase's like "g-machine" to prove to me they really are engineering these with performance at the top of thier list. if they are good...but prove it.
as far as the heidts 2nd yea it did good... but were not talking about a 1st gen either, i mean how much better to you actually think thier car would perform over a stock sub /leaf car???
|
I am really glad you asked.....
Stock subframe- 2 degrees caster, camber loss
Our subframe- 6-7 degree caster, Increased camber gain (thank you pro-g tall spindle), Increased anti-dive.
Please please please do not confuse this with mustang II geometry. It is FAR from MustangII geometry.
