View Single Post
  #5  
Old 03-08-2010, 06:01 PM
bob442 bob442 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: winnipeg manitoba canada
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I dont mean to come off cockey or argumentive. I'm just throwing what i've found out about the rear end out there, i guess i should have mentioned i plan on hitting atleast 500 Whp, so the Dana 36 won't hold up to that, *If i'm correct*

with the G's (and i'm not talking about my friends in the ghetto, but a unit of inertial force on a body that is subjected to rapid acceleration or gravity) that the rear may experiance, i want to auto cross this car, and have the option of going on a drift course with the opertune chance. I do realise that is acomplishable with both rear IRS's. As i would *imagine* drifting a car would be harder on the rear end with the camber set off, and high RPMS, and there for being harder on the u joints, hubs, and half shafts, where as the dual controll arms would only be hard on the hub. But then again, i dont surly know the answer to that.

This thread isnt about what i think, but what i dont know. You clearly know more about the C4 style rear end then i do, and i'm am taking your knowledge as an influence. Again i'm sorry if i came off in any different of a way to you or anyone else.

I still need to find out about the adaptor for a C5 rear end how ever.

Bob
Reply With Quote