...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Transmission and Rear End
User Name
Password



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old 03-08-2010, 06:01 PM
bob442 bob442 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: winnipeg manitoba canada
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I dont mean to come off cockey or argumentive. I'm just throwing what i've found out about the rear end out there, i guess i should have mentioned i plan on hitting atleast 500 Whp, so the Dana 36 won't hold up to that, *If i'm correct*

with the G's (and i'm not talking about my friends in the ghetto, but a unit of inertial force on a body that is subjected to rapid acceleration or gravity) that the rear may experiance, i want to auto cross this car, and have the option of going on a drift course with the opertune chance. I do realise that is acomplishable with both rear IRS's. As i would *imagine* drifting a car would be harder on the rear end with the camber set off, and high RPMS, and there for being harder on the u joints, hubs, and half shafts, where as the dual controll arms would only be hard on the hub. But then again, i dont surly know the answer to that.

This thread isnt about what i think, but what i dont know. You clearly know more about the C4 style rear end then i do, and i'm am taking your knowledge as an influence. Again i'm sorry if i came off in any different of a way to you or anyone else.

I still need to find out about the adaptor for a C5 rear end how ever.

Bob
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net