Quote:
Originally Posted by frojoe
Maybe this thread pretty quickly went in a massively-wayward and obscurely technical direction, hence the silence from Mark, since he's likely moved on to 1 or 2 other new main/side projects....
Just a thought.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAP
The conundrum we always face with these technical interchanges is that only discussions within a broad public-domain definition can be occur. As soon as we get into something that's truly technically intriguing, IP corporate concerns shut down any further discourse. (The dark side of engineering that they never told us about at MIT.)
If I'm right about this, then we won't be hearing back from Mark in this thread again. Of course, I hope I'm wrong about this.
Best,
MAP
|
MAP, you might start a new thread in an appropriate subforum for your discussion, see what develops.
If it feels like the tangents you present are worthy of in depth discussion yet detract from a thread... Or drive off the original poster then that is likely the case and worthy of reconsidering.
That doesn't necessarily mean they won't be welcome discussions in their own right.