...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-07-2010, 09:49 PM
Scatterbrained Scatterbrained is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default LS1 or LT1

There's alot of people putting LS1's (or LS based engines) in their 1st gen Camaros. And there's obviously a good reason for it. But I wonder how many have considered putting an LT1 in the car instead?

I know there are alot of good reasons for an LS1, but as a budget alternative, for a boulevard cruiser, why not an LT1?

Scatter'd
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-08-2010, 07:57 AM
64duece 64duece is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Its viable option and done before but.....LT1's were installed in production vehicles from 13 to 18yrs ago. The limited production makes the aftermarket parts abit more expensive and a fresh rebuild + donor may cost more than a crate 5.3 which makes the same 300hp.

I purchased a brand new crate 5.3 on ebay for $1800 and dropped in with factory PCM.
__________________
Dennis
Moore Racecraft
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2010, 08:30 AM
130fe 130fe is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 779
Thanks: 225
Thanked 40 Times in 29 Posts
Thumbs up

They are a good alternative to putting an LS in a project. I put mine in back in 01 and it has ran great. The aftermarket never really caught up to it like it has the LS stuff. If you are looking for a simple 325RWHP cruiser they are a good candidate. You can argue over conversion costs between the two all day (between LS/LT stuff). The costs really start to get highon LT's when you want more than the 450 RWHP range. Can it be done, yes, but in the end you can get the same if not more out of an LS swap. I will be pulling my LT this fall for a L92. Is there anything wrong with it, no. I just want more power and doing the engine swap is alot cheaper than trying to build another car.
__________________
Chris
1968 Camaro SS
LS3/T56
Full of DSE and Holley parts
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-08-2010, 08:45 PM
93Polo 93Polo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I am usually a defender of the LT1s (having owned both) but it is hard to argue against the LS motors as cheap as they are getting. If all out power is not the goal 5.3s can make for a good budget build. With the 5.3 in, you're in a much better position if you ever want to go with a bigger LS based motor. Low mileage LT1s are also getting harder to find.
__________________
Lamar
69 Camaro RS traded
70 Chevelle SS 396
93 PoloGreen C4 LT1/ZF6 gone
00 FRC C5 436rwhp/415rwtq ported 5.3 heads/cam, MovIt Brembo Big Reds, 04 Z06 suspension
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-09-2010, 08:39 PM
bob442 bob442 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: winnipeg manitoba canada
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I bought a rebuilt 355 SBC complete for $500, i sold it the other day in favor of the LSx motor, the aftermarket is exploding for them, and running EFI has never been easier, if you find a LSx motor out of a vehicle, you can grab that PCM and harness, and hook it up with as little as 5 wires to make it run on the floor! i've looked into these way to much. you would want to get a 00+ motor as they changed the oil galley, and get a washer to put in the oil pump to bump up the oil pressure, as they are known for loosing oil pressure at high RPMS.

If you get a LSx (and there called LSx because the heads and almost all parts are interchangable) a LT1 is a revision of a SBC, and yes, the after market and parts are limited, and the opti spark is a big headache. if you want more wiring info to run EFI with extreme ease, check out these guys.

www.eficonnection.com

i hope this answers your questions, if you need any more info from me, just send me a PM as i'm over flowing with info in my head about this swap.

I'll try to check in again into this topic if i remember.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-10-2010, 09:31 PM
JimM JimM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Yorkville, IL
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I've always had a soft spot for LT1's
__________________
Webmaster (lol)
68 Camaro Vert, SS clone, #'s matching 383-TKO500
04 Silverado SS, 93 Polo Green Vette
My Camaro Board
http://www.Jimragtop.com
Jim's Blog!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-27-2010, 05:01 AM
CreepinDeth's Avatar
CreepinDeth CreepinDeth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago burbs
Posts: 175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I think the optispark is a good reason to steer clear of the LT1's.
Besides the power output VS the newer 5.3L for budget minded people.

I put a 26,000 mile 2004 LS1 / 4L60e out of a GTO in my 78z.
Best investment I ever made. I want a Gen IV 6.0L for my 70 442 clone.
I already have a T56 waiting on standby.

Investing money into the 70 Olds Rocket 350 with the archaic heads
just isn't a route I want to go. It's going to be so much cheaper to
go salvage LS Gen IV with EFI and close to 400hp+ easily.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net