...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-30-2005, 09:05 PM
T Bell T Bell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Edelbrock IAS

Anybody running or have run these? Is it all just hype?
__________________
1972 Nova 355, 4 spd, rusty but something to drive.
1972 Pro-touring Cutlass S in the works....still
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-31-2005, 01:56 AM
4mm 4mm is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South TX
Posts: 926
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

They seem to work pretty good on my 71 Mustang Boss 351. Remember, this car is heavier than the earlier gens and they seem to be to my satisfaction. Dont waste your money on the cheaper KYB's. I also have Koni's on my 70 Boss 302 and they work a bit better than the brocks since they are adjustable. I have a complete global west setup on the 71 and complete TCP setup on the 70.The brocks are the best of the mid priced shocks, IMO. You can get them in red or for the old school look in grey.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-31-2005, 03:43 PM
T Bell T Bell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I not too familiar with adjustable shocks. You basically can soften or stiffen the ride to your liking? I've seen the QA1s but can't see $300-500 for 2 shocks. They are offered in single and double adjustable. What exactly are you adjusting? Sorry for the noob question, but I'm a noob.
__________________
1972 Nova 355, 4 spd, rusty but something to drive.
1972 Pro-touring Cutlass S in the works....still
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-2005, 01:56 AM
4mm 4mm is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South TX
Posts: 926
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Some are adjustable on compression only (when car dives downward) and some are adjustable on both compression and rebound (when car rises upwards after compression). QA1 makes the dual adjustable types too but are more expensive than single adjustable. Spending money on shocks can be one of your best investments, think about off roading, circle track, drag racing, ect... Shock tuning and shock performance makes the difference in winning or losing, especially on track cars.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-01-2005, 08:50 PM
vintageracer's Avatar
vintageracer vintageracer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hillbilly Hollywood, Tennessee
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

Remember what a shock abosorber does. It controls the spring and a spring compresses and then releases that energy. 4musclemachinesman gave you a short sweet description of the function of a shock absorber.

Non adjustable shocks are factory set for rebound and compression and are a BIG compromise to what your actual needs may be. Your needs will be different that other folks as this is a function of driving style, type of vehicle and road conditions.

The more you spend, the more control and precision you get. That's why anyone racing now sets up their shocks on a shock absorber dyno. At many tracks around the country AFCO will be happy to dyno your shocks for free. Once they tell you how poorly your shocks are performing they will then properly set up your shocks to meet the conditions for a princely fee. This assumes you have adjustable or rebuildable shocks. Example, all Koni's are rebuildable. Rebuilding/Reseting is a lot cheaper than purchasing new again.

A good set of shocks can cost $1,000+ easy! If you want to go fast on a road course, spend your money on shocks and brakes! Of course this assumes you have a decent suspension setup to begin your odyssey.

Shocks for fine tuning your handling and brakes to go deep in the corners! Horsepower has its place however if you were to give me $2,000 to spend anyway I want on my car, it will be shocks and brakes as I will get the most benefit for the dollar. Horsepower would be the last place. That assumes that YOU are capable of driving to YOUR car's "existing" capability. Most drivers are not that capable. They "think" they are, but are not! If your driving ability is not at the capability of your existing car then I would then say spend your $2,000 on a GOOD driver's school.

A great example of this was the last HSR race at Barber Motorsports Park in April. One of the 1969 Corvette drivers in my class needed another driver for the 1 hour endurance race. He got a professional "shoe" who runs another class to team with him. The first time the professional shoe drove the car in practice he turned laps 5 seconds FASTER than the owner who has driven the car for 3 years! David's comments (the professional shoe) was the car handled great, plenty of power, turned in great and had **** brakes. If the car has good brakes there was another 3-4 seconds in the car! The owner of the Corvette was THRILLED to learn this information as he NOW knows that he does NOT need to spend a bunch of money on parts to improve lap times. He needs instruction to improve HIS skills.

Someone in a previous post mentioned KYB's. They are exactly what they are sold to be, cheap gas shocks. LOT'S of compression and very little rebound. They do a wonderful job of stiffening your suspension and a poor job of controlling the springs energy on rebound. Edelbrocks have much better rebound control and as such are a much better shock. QA1's, AFCO, Penske, Koni, etc. are all great shocks if properly tailored to your car and driving style. I watch guys at vintage races make multiple shock changes during the weekend to get the car "right". I have always been amazed at the dedication of vintage racer's since we run for such large amounts of money to win. First pays the same as last, NOTHING ($0.00).

Spend hard earned money on quality shock absorbers. You and your car will be handsomely rewarded!
__________________
Mike

Remember "Drive Fast, Turn Heads, Break Hearts"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-01-2005, 09:39 PM
T Bell T Bell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well stated Mike. I definately get the picture. Thanks.
__________________
1972 Nova 355, 4 spd, rusty but something to drive.
1972 Pro-touring Cutlass S in the works....still
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-02-2005, 08:11 PM
vintageracer's Avatar
vintageracer vintageracer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hillbilly Hollywood, Tennessee
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

I am running the "red" Eldebrocks on a 70 Chevelle convertible. They work well on this car given the current stock type suspension and Eldebrock's reasonable price.
__________________
Mike

Remember "Drive Fast, Turn Heads, Break Hearts"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-02-2005, 09:35 PM
Marcus SC&C's Avatar
Marcus SC&C Marcus SC&C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: S.E. PA.
Posts: 169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have to agree with Mike,the Edelbrock shocks work pretty well for the price. I have a set on my daily driver and I`m pretty happy with them. I wouldn`t use them on a serious performance car though and it`s been said that they don`t tolerate (they can wear out fast) working much outside of their intended spring rate range. QA1 std. adjustables control both compression and rebound with a single knob (unlike most single adj. shocks). Their double adj. shocks just let you adjust each independently. We use them on a lot of customer cars as well as our own G-5 suspension test car. They`re a really great shocks for the money. I`m a big fan. Summit and Jegs have them for around $150ea. and they`re well worth it IMO. Marcus
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-03-2005, 07:06 AM
T Bell T Bell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well, I would like to have my car as a daily driver. But it will probably get me to work about 2 times a week and weekend trips. Not in to road racing, yet. It is a decision between the Edelbrocks and the QA1s. On one hand I like the adjustabilty but I don't see me actually using it that much. But I would hate to get the Edelbrocks to find out that they don't ride or handle well. Leaning more towards the QA1s.
__________________
1972 Nova 355, 4 spd, rusty but something to drive.
1972 Pro-touring Cutlass S in the works....still
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-13-2005, 11:51 PM
rwhite692's Avatar
rwhite692 rwhite692 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have a set up front, I really like them. Definately firm and not a lot of rebound.
__________________
______________________________________________
1969 Camaro/ Tom Nelson TT 434 / Wayne Due C5 / DSE QLink / and a bunch of other stuff...

Project update thread here:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=12743

My Lateral-G Page

My Shop Build:

http://www.garagejournal.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=16310
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net