...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Wheels and Tires
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2007, 08:25 PM
bucks69 bucks69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Ideal front wheel backspacing for a GENI

Hey guys if you were building your "ideal" road/street racer what would be the backspacing you would want on the front with a 17"x10" wheel And also an 18"X10" wheel? Also to go a little further what would the rear backspacing be for a 18"x12 and a 19"x12"? This is assuming you were going with a custom frame and could go with whatever size and backspacing you want. This is for a regularly driven street car if that helps any. Also please elaborate a little about your decisions please. Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2007, 12:50 AM
DriverzInc DriverzInc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,427
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well, ideally, you would want to have a 0 offset on both wheels. Keeping things centered puts less stress on bearings and such. Ask any mechanical engineer, they'll tell you the same.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2007, 08:23 AM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

This could quickly turn into a huge technical discussion on suspension. But, short story, since longer is better for suspension arms, you would end up with a big possitive offset on your front wheels to make your suspension design better. But for looks most do not like the high positive offset wheels and want some "lip" on the wheel.

On a live axle rear it does not matter.
__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2007, 10:07 AM
bucks69 bucks69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Jon and Frank. I appreciate the reply. So as far as looks go(performance second hand) what would be the suggested backspacing that you would consider when you would be doing your own car. This has been my brickwall on ordering stuff and I know I am overthinking this I just dont want to be wrong this early in...LOL
Thanks again
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2007, 10:16 AM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

It depends. I am assuming you are mini tub? So we usually do a 6 to 6.25 backspace. Although I did buy a dozen custom 19" outer rims shells to be able to do a 6" lip on Lisa's Project EmptyNest which is right at 5" backspace or so. Looks KILLER! On the front, a 8" rim with 4 3/4 backspace is usually good on stock track width and give a nice 2" lip. Again, though if you are designing the front suspension from scratch, you would want to make the arms as long as possible, changing you backspace. Brake caliper clearance also will be a dictator here.

If you would like to talk through this you are welcome to call

four zero seven 832 1752
8 AM to 10 PM
__________________
Frank Serafine

Last edited by ProdigyCustoms; 12-30-2007 at 10:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2007, 10:29 PM
bucks69 bucks69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Frank I will call tomorrow if you are open. And yes front track width is whatever I want it to be so I just need to know what a decent backspacing would be. I need that info to order, I also have to account for brakes and what that would do to the width needed. Thanks again
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-30-2007, 10:34 PM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I will be around 8 AM to 5 PM eastern tomorrow. Our New Years Eve party starts in the afternoon so................................
__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:29 AM
parsonsj parsonsj is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 659
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Well, I'm certain this has been discussed before, but I'll weigh in with my thoughts.

In the back, wheel backspacing for a live axle style is just user preference. Lots of backspacing, neutral backspacing, etc. just doesn't matter that much. Reducing strain on the bearings via neutral backspacing isn't such a bad idea.

In the front is where the discussion gets interesting. Ideally, the wheel should be set up such that scrub radius (the difference between the pivot point established by the ball joint centerlines, and the center of the tire contact patch) is less than an inch. Modern suspensions with a KPI of 8-14 degrees usually need a wheel with a significant backspace. My clean sheet of paper design for my car used an 18x9 wheel with 7.375" of backspacing. Have a look at modern cars with oem wheels and you'll find that nearly all of them have "flat" wheels (not much exposed lip) for this reason.

For a brief discussion of this have a look here.

jp
__________________
John Parsons

II Much Fabrication's Blog New products, Fabrication sequences, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-31-2007, 09:08 AM
bucks69 bucks69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the link John.Now it wont pull it up for some reason. HMMM
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-31-2007, 12:23 PM
James OLC's Avatar
James OLC James OLC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,459
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

John's reasoning and his explanation in the PHR article is (as usual) bang on and reflects how we planned out the backspacing for our '67 - although we didn't have a clean slate to start with as we were already committed to a subframe and suspension design. In our case we ended up with 6.125" BS and an 8.5" wheel running a 255/35 18 tire. I do not think that this setup will work with all first gen's as it is dependant on a lot of different factors including control arm choices, spindles, and even tie rods, not to mention your subframe. It would have been ideal to go with more but this was the absolute maximum that we could accomodate in our configuration.
__________________
James
1967 Camaro RS - The OLC
1967 Camaro RS - Recycler
1969 Camaro - Dusty
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net