...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Wheels and Tires
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-15-2008, 09:12 AM
OLDFLM's Avatar
OLDFLM OLDFLM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 173
Thanked 153 Times in 93 Posts
Default True Tire Heights?

I'm looking for new wheels/tires for my 71 Firebird and for reference I took someone's suggestion and went out to measure my fender lip heights. With the current rolling stock of 255/60/15s and 275/60/15s the front fender lip measures in at 27.5" with the 255/50/15 at 26" and the rear fender lip measures in at 28.5" with the 275/60/15 at 27".

My question is that the 275/60/15 supposedly measures 28" according to most charts not the measured 27"... what's the deal? The tires are mounted on 15x7 Pontiac Rally IIs. When looking at new tires, say a 285/40/18 for out back, the charts say they measure 27", but do they really?

V/R,
Ty
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:36 AM
astroracer astroracer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Tire diameter is dependent on rim width. Your 7" rim is making the tire taller. I believe the recommended rim width for a 275 is 8"-10" so your narrow rim is creating a taller profile.
When checking tire sizes you will see that the diameter is measured on a certain width rim. Going wider or narrower will alter the number slightly and an inch isn't uncommon.
Mark
__________________
"Bad Ast" Astro Van Pro-Touring Project.... Heat, beat, file to fit, paint to match...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:47 AM
OLDFLM's Avatar
OLDFLM OLDFLM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 173
Thanked 153 Times in 93 Posts
Default

Normally I'd agree... but it's actually measuring an inch shorter than advertised...even on a 7" rim! ???
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-15-2008, 08:54 PM
79ZED 79ZED is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Tire diameter is not the rolling diameter. What you need is the rolling radius of the tire at typical inflation pressures and load weights. Tire manufacturers usually have this info.

John
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-16-2008, 09:02 AM
LCAC_Man LCAC_Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oceanside, CA.
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OLDFLM View Post
Normally I'd agree... but it's actually measuring an inch shorter than advertised...even on a 7" rim! ???
Good luck getting this from any of the tire manufacturers. The advertised specs always list the tire height as more that it truely is. Very few are closer than an 1" of the true height.
__________________
Len
67 Camaro SS350 Convertible
406/200r4
Len's PT Garage
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-21-2008, 10:30 AM
72blackbird 72blackbird is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I checked the 235/60R15s on 8.5" rims currently on my car now- they measure 25.25", not the 26" spec listed in BFG's literature. As ZED mentioned, the rolling diameter increases due to heat generated when the tire is in use.

Geno
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-21-2008, 01:11 PM
gearheads78's Avatar
gearheads78 gearheads78 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 801
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

You are measuring with the weight on the car on it. Its much closer to advertised if you measure off the car but aired up and mounted on a wheel.
__________________
66 Cutlass "Joe-Touring"
54' Olds 88 "Joe-Touring 2.0"
69 SS Camaro 4-speed (wife's)

Richard J.
If only I had the time talent and money to build everything in my head
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-21-2008, 02:44 PM
Silver69Camaro Silver69Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 270
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gearheads78 View Post
You are measuring with the weight on the car on it. Its much closer to advertised if you measure off the car but aired up and mounted on a wheel.
Is that what you guys are doing? General rule of thumb is the rolling radius is 5/8" to 1" shorter than unloaded radius. Rear is about 1/2".
__________________
Matt Jones
Mechanical Engineer
Art Morrison Enterprises
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net