...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-01-2015, 07:11 PM
indydave indydave is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Speedway Indiana
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 2016 SCCA CAM rules

2016 CAM rules in downloadable PDF form

https://www.facebook.com/download/14...es%20Final.pdf
__________________
Dave Dusterberg
BoD President, Indy Region SCCA
1979 Aspen R/T (PT car under construction)
2005 Mustang GT (current autocross tool)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-01-2015, 07:27 PM
SSLance's Avatar
SSLance SSLance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 2,683
Thanks: 72
Thanked 338 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Hopefully everyone likes the changes. There was a lot of discussion internally back and forth on how to handle a few things and I think the SCCA (mainly Raleigh Boreen) got them right.

I know I'm happy to be racing in CAM-T now instead of against showroom fresh Mustangs and Camaros. Corvette guys should be pleased as well to have a place to play.
__________________
Lance
1985 Monte Carlo SS Street Car
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-01-2015, 07:28 PM
craig510's Avatar
craig510 craig510 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 290
Thanks: 22
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Are any vehicles older than 1954 allowed in CAM?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2015, 08:56 PM
SSLance's Avatar
SSLance SSLance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 2,683
Thanks: 72
Thanked 338 Times in 212 Posts
Default

__________________
Lance
1985 Monte Carlo SS Street Car
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2015, 10:22 PM
craig510's Avatar
craig510 craig510 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 290
Thanks: 22
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Default

If I read them correctly you could build a 2350 pound 90 inch wheelbase hot rod (32 ford, model A, etc) with ABS and traction control to give the corvettes a run for the money.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-02-2015, 12:19 AM
Chad-1stGen's Avatar
Chad-1stGen Chad-1stGen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 743
Thanks: 2
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts
Default

One of the local SCCA late model Mustang guys is convinced that opening CAM T up to allow the fox body mustang up to 93 in is going to make them the dominant car. His theory is based on how dirt cheap it is to turn them into a handling powerhouse.

We will see.
__________________
Autocross and Track blog

Lots of autocross & track day videos of my car: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheDude023
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-02-2015, 04:59 AM
71RS/SS396's Avatar
71RS/SS396 71RS/SS396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wake Forest,NC
Posts: 872
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Some of those rules make me scratch my head and wonder why? Lexan windows and no headliner are allowed yet unpainted aluminum door/interior panels are not.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-02-2015, 07:15 AM
SSLance's Avatar
SSLance SSLance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 2,683
Thanks: 72
Thanked 338 Times in 212 Posts
Default

The Lexan thing surprised me as well, IIRC last year they were only going to let Lexan windshields be legal 1 more year...then they just take the restriction away this year. Same with the headliner, not sure why they allow it to be removed?

I think several of the new interior rules are a direct result of the backlash from the Summit cars being at the Invitational. I'm glad they cleared up the interior panel rules, if it was upholstered originally...it's to be upholstered again, if it was covered by one panel, it's to be covered by one panel again, original dash can be modified, but must be in place. Maybe there are a LOT of cars running that people haven't put headliners back in? I've never really noticed...

I'm actually pretty surprised at the number of now CAM-T cars that are running ABS and will have to disable it to now run in CAM-T. Didn't realize it was that big of an issue until it was made illegal.
__________________
Lance
1985 Monte Carlo SS Street Car
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-02-2015, 11:15 AM
Chad-1stGen's Avatar
Chad-1stGen Chad-1stGen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 743
Thanks: 2
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts
Default

How does the Lexan and weight work? If you are running CAM T you have to weight a minimum of 3,000 lbs. Does than mean if you run a Lexan windshield you have to weight a minimum of 3,150 lbs? I guess that isn't a big deal for a lot of the heavier cars and is a way for them to get closer to the minimum weight.
__________________
Autocross and Track blog

Lots of autocross & track day videos of my car: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheDude023
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-02-2015, 01:15 PM
preston preston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 653
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 17 Posts
Default

I don't have any plans to race in CAM but I'm just curious - My car has a complete custom frame/suspension and the sheet metal body has been widened 4". But, full interior and glass.

Would it really be legal to compete in this class ? If so it seems like that is a pretty wide hole to drive through. Which is great but it seems susceptible to the same cost creep that afflicts all of these attempts.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net