...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2008, 08:07 AM
BallnRods's Avatar
BallnRods BallnRods is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denton, Texas
Posts: 272
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 2008 Challenger Slammed w/ new Shoes

I can't wait for the prices to come down on these so I can get one.
This thing is SICK!!!

__________________
~Chris
1973 Mustang SportsRoof
1985 Camaro Z28 Totaled, 1985 Camaro Berlinetta SOLD, 1989 Camaro RS SOLD, 1985 Corvette SOLD, 1969 Camaro Pro-Street SOLD, 1955 Chevy PU 1st Series SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-22-2008, 08:33 AM
tones2SS's Avatar
tones2SS tones2SS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8,176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Thumbs up

THAT IS NASTY!!!!!
Especially the rear shot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2008, 08:51 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Looks great.. but in person that car is HUGE..

I wish it wasn't 4,000 lbs and I wish it didn't only have an automatic.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2008, 08:57 AM
markss28 markss28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TX.
Posts: 561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The horse power to weight is bad on these cars. Sure 425 hp sounds great but only if the car weighed in at 3500 lbs not 4000. These cars are good for low 13s but lose about 500lbs and thats mid 12s atleast
__________________
Never Stay Stock
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-22-2008, 09:04 AM
ironworks's Avatar
ironworks ironworks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 5,156
Thanks: 4
Thanked 35 Times in 21 Posts
Default

The new camaro is supposed to weigh 4000 lbs also. Crazy
__________________
www.ironworksspeedandkustom.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-22-2008, 09:12 AM
rjsjea's Avatar
rjsjea rjsjea is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 667
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

The car looks cool.......
__________________
RobS
71 Demon, AlterK - 4 link GenIII hemi conversion
66 Rambler Classic Wagon, LS conversion -Scott's IFS/4bar-bagged
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-22-2008, 09:16 AM
ArisESQ ArisESQ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Gatos
Posts: 765
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Default

gaahhhh! that looks awesome!

and yes, it is a pig, but i dont care. for a daily driver that car would be perfect!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-22-2008, 09:26 AM
jy211's Avatar
jy211 jy211 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Miami Florida
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
I wish it didn't only have an automatic.
Just a couple of months until that wish is granted
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-22-2008, 11:06 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ironworks View Post
The new camaro is supposed to weigh 4000 lbs also. Crazy

I thought it was lighter than that?


Anyways, I asked a GM engineer about this and he said to blame it on the Govt crash standards and cost. The cheapest and easiest way to make a car safer is to throw mass at it. That's one of the main reason these cars are so heavy.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-22-2008, 11:53 AM
Musclerodz's Avatar
Musclerodz Musclerodz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: washington, ok
Posts: 4,286
Thanks: 22
Thanked 164 Times in 95 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
I thought it was lighter than that?


Anyways, I asked a GM engineer about this and he said to blame it on the Govt crash standards and cost. The cheapest and easiest way to make a car safer is to throw mass at it. That's one of the main reason these cars are so heavy.
Not the direction you want to go if you are trying to gain mpg to keep up with CAFE requirements.

BTW, that thing is SICK!!!!
__________________
Mike Redpath
Musclerodz & Customz
facebook page
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net