...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2010, 11:26 AM
Denvervet's Avatar
Denvervet Denvervet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 143
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default EFI fuel pressure ?

I am planning on using one of Ricks new efi tanks that is set up for 58psi regulator. Brings up a good question. Why do aftermarket EFI system suggests 42-45psi vs some other pressure? What could or would be the downside of running more or less?
I will be running accel Gen 7 but that's just the ECM . I am not running their regulator or fuel pump, etc.
Is there a difference with how the injectors perform with pressure difference? I can imagine there is but....?
__________________
68 camaro, 572, tko
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2010, 02:56 PM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,202
Thanks: 6,546
Thanked 2,009 Times in 914 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Denvervet View Post
I am planning on using one of Ricks new efi tanks that is set up for 58psi regulator. Brings up a good question. Why do aftermarket EFI system suggests 42-45psi vs some other pressure? What could or would be the downside of running more or less?
I will be running accel Gen 7 but that's just the ECM . I am not running their regulator or fuel pump, etc.
Is there a difference with how the injectors perform with pressure difference? I can imagine there is but....?
most of the later model LS stuff is all 58 psi. I have heard the reason they did that was because they also went to returnless systems and the higher pressure helped avoid any vapor lock issues. (actually they still return, but the regulator is built into the fuel filter and bypasses there instead of going to the fuel rails and then bypassing to the tank.

With that said I don't think there's any issue running the higher psi as long as the tune is set up for it; if you convert from a 43 psi tune to 58 psi the higher pressure will make it richer and require re-tuning.

Jody
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2010, 03:11 PM
Denvervet's Avatar
Denvervet Denvervet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 143
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Good points. Makes sense that if one has an ECM with preset tuning then changing pressure would be an issue. With many aftermarket ECMs being tunable one could adjust as needed. thx
__________________
68 camaro, 572, tko
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2010, 07:45 PM
supremeefi supremeefi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central fl
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camcojb View Post
most of the later model LS stuff is all 58 psi. I have heard the reason they did that was because they also went to returnless systems and the higher pressure helped avoid any vapor lock issues. (actually they still return, but the regulator is built into the fuel filter and bypasses there instead of going to the fuel rails and then bypassing to the tank.

With that said I don't think there's any issue running the higher psi as long as the tune is set up for it; if you convert from a 43 psi tune to 58 psi the higher pressure will make it richer and require re-tuning.

Jody
That's not entirely true. On most aftermarket systems once the O2 turns on it'll correct to the programmed air/fuel ratio. The only time it fattens it is in cold start or any other condition that the O2 isn't operating in. Most injectors are rated at 3 bar or 43.5 psi, that's why most regulators are set at that. Some older style injectors get slower as you increase pressure. Doesn't mean much on a programmable Sequential ECM like the Gen 7 but on others it can effect performance, especially at idle. Increased pressure can enhance the spray pattern and atomization though on some injectors, just depends on the type.

OEM stuff works differently. Most of it is programmed to run at stoich throughout much of the rpm range. However they will run richer in power mode with more pressure cuz the O2 turns off and goes to as premapped fuel curve.

If you need help on your Gen 7 let me know. I'm the guy on their website.

Mark

Last edited by supremeefi; 09-29-2010 at 07:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2010, 07:57 PM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,202
Thanks: 6,546
Thanked 2,009 Times in 914 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeefi View Post
That's not entirely true. On most aftermarket systems once the O2 turns on it'll correct to the programmed air/fuel ratio. The only time it fattens it is in cold start or any other condition that the O2 isn't operating in. Most injectors are rated at 3 bar or 43.5 psi, that's why most regulators are set at that. Some older style injectors get slower as you increase pressure. Doesn't mean much on a programmable Sequential ECM like the Gen 7 but on others it can effect performance, especially at idle. Increased pressure can enhance the spray pattern and atomization though on some injectors, just depends on the type.

OEM stuff works differently. Most of it is programmed to run at stoich throughout much of the rpm range. However they will run richer in power mode with more pressure cuz the O2 turns off and goes to as premapped fuel curve.

If you need help on your Gen 7 let me know. I'm the guy on their website.

Mark
that's not entirely true............ Do you tune a car just enough to get it so closed loop can add or subtract and keep the desired a/f? Or do you tune it so the add/subtract from the O2's is minimal when in closed loop? Bottom line, bumping pressure from 43.5 to 58 psi is going to richen the a/f, and should be accompanied with a tuning change. My humble opinion anyway..........

Jody
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2010, 08:37 PM
supremeefi supremeefi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central fl
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camcojb View Post
that's not entirely true............ Do you tune a car just enough to get it so closed loop can add or subtract and keep the desired a/f? Or do you tune it so the add/subtract from the O2's is minimal when in closed loop? Bottom line, bumping pressure from 43.5 to 58 psi is going to richen the a/f, and should be accompanied with a tuning change. My humble opinion anyway..........

Jody
I tune it for minimal correction so if you bump the pressure and the O2 is correcting it'll correct right back to the preprogrammed air/fuel, period.

If it's tuned to where the O2 has a big correction to begin with then yes it will fatten it, only because the O2 runs out of room so to speak.

Last edited by supremeefi; 09-29-2010 at 09:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2010, 09:36 PM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,202
Thanks: 6,546
Thanked 2,009 Times in 914 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeefi View Post
I tune it for minimal correction so if you bump the pressure and the O2 is correcting it'll correct right back to the preprogrammed air/fuel, period.

If it's tuned to where the O2 has a big correction to begin with then yes it will fatten it, only because the O2 runs out of room so to speak.
my point was that if it's tuned for minimal correct and then you bump the pressure that much, it will no longer be tuned for minimal correction.... You are correct, should have enough room for the O2's in closed loop to correct it, but my point was that it will change the O2 correction and a tuning adjustment will be needed to get it back as close as it was. Not saying it won't run. Just saying I would tweak the tune to get it back to optimal.

Jody
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-30-2010, 06:46 AM
supremeefi supremeefi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central fl
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camcojb View Post
my point was that if it's tuned for minimal correct and then you bump the pressure that much, it will no longer be tuned for minimal correction.... You are correct, should have enough room for the O2's in closed loop to correct it, but my point was that it will change the O2 correction and a tuning adjustment will be needed to get it back as close as it was. Not saying it won't run. Just saying I would tweak the tune to get it back to optimal.

Jody
O.K but you said it would run richer, it won't, not if the O2 has enough room to correct.

The opposite is true when someone has tuned it for minimal correction and then you use fuel with more ethanol in it, guess what, it'll have to add fuel. But as long as it was done correctly there shouldn't be an issue, no more so than an older EFI'd car that was calibrated for 100% petroleum based fuel and now runs on todays 90/10.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-30-2010, 08:55 AM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,202
Thanks: 6,546
Thanked 2,009 Times in 914 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeefi View Post
O.K but you said it would run richer, it won't, not if the O2 has enough room to correct.
well, it will run richer during warm up, cold start, and any open loop areas. That's also a big "if" on if there's enough room for the O2 to correct. Should be I agree.

We're not disagreeing, just playing semantics. My point was raising the fuel pressure will affect the a/f and I would re-tune to compensate to get my trims back in line and to get my cold start and open loop areas back where they need to be. But you are correct in that there should be enough correction available in the O2's to at least keep the closed loop areas in line, but again that assumes the tuning is right in the first place. If the O2's are already maxed out or close to it, and are pulling a bunch of fuel in closed loop to maintain the desired a/f then raising the fuel pressure will cause it to run richer then desired all the time...........

I do appreciate your info and feedback.

Jody
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank

Last edited by camcojb; 09-30-2010 at 08:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-30-2010, 04:59 PM
Denvervet's Avatar
Denvervet Denvervet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 143
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the input guys Didn't mean to start something...lol Supreme once I get my project to that point I just my hire you to help some. I do have a person that came highly recommended and well versed in Gen 7 stuff lined up locally. After reading some posts here even expert (?) people can struggle with this Gen 7 stuff.
__________________
68 camaro, 572, tko
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net