...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Wheels and Tires
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-06-2012, 12:57 PM
cjperry81 cjperry81 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 40 series vs. 45

I have a 65 Mustang that is on 2 inch drop spindles in the front and 2 inch blocks in the back. I just ordered 17's for the front and 18's for the rear. I wanted 40 series but the guy at the wheel shop says i should go with 45's. Does anyone have pictures of the different sizes on those size wheels so I can see the difference. Plus what is people's opinion? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-06-2012, 04:35 PM
nacnac nacnac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

How wide are you talking? I think the 45's will be too tall, especially on an 18 in a 65 mustang. Go with the 40's?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-06-2012, 05:06 PM
214Chevy's Avatar
214Chevy 214Chevy is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DALLAS, Texas
Posts: 4,688
Thanks: 458
Thanked 689 Times in 421 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nacnac View Post
How wide are you talking? I think the 45's will be too tall, especially on an 18 in a 65 mustang. Go with the 40's?
I agree, a 45 sidewall is pretty tall. I think the 40's would look nice.
__________________
'68 C10 swb
'69 Camaro convertible
'72 Chevelle

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-06-2012, 05:43 PM
intocarss's Avatar
intocarss intocarss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal in the Sfv
Posts: 4,257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I agree 45's are to tall
__________________
If it ain't buckin, chirpin & makin all kinds of bad noises, then I ain't happy

Accelerating is optional...........stopping is mandatory. Your car WILL stop one way or another.

Last edited by intocarss; 01-06-2012 at 05:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-06-2012, 06:21 PM
cjperry81 cjperry81 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

They are 17x7 up front and 18x9 in the rear. I thought that 45 was gonna be too tall. Especially since my goal was to tuck them since im running 2 inch drop spindles and 2 inch lowering blocks. Wheels and tires are foreign to me but I knew that guy was wrong about 45s. Thanks a lot guys. I appreciate the help
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-06-2012, 10:06 PM
skatinjay27's Avatar
skatinjay27 skatinjay27 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 1,778
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

the side wall is a percent number and the actual height is determined by the width of a tire.
__________________
AJ

1970 1/2 rs z28...pro-touring?...i wish...soon?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2012, 06:39 AM
Apogee Apogee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skatinjay27 View Post
the side wall is a percent number and the actual height is determined by the width of a tire.
X2...without a width, you can't say. You should be looking first at the overall tire diameter, there are many calculators online. The next thing from an aesthetic standpoint would be to make sure that you have similar amounts of sidewall front and rear with your 17/18 diameter stagger or else it will look funky IMO. This means that your rear tires should be 1" larger in diameter than the fronts.

Tobin
KORE3
__________________
www.kore3.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net