...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2010, 12:08 PM
yam924 yam924 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default question about 1969 camaro steering linkage?

Hi,
I am a new member to the Lateral G forum. I am building a 1969 Camaro with a blown 427, manual transmission, and all the usual Pro-touring suspension goodies. I have run into an issue concerning the steering linkage, and am looking to see if anyone has come across this.
The car has stock inner tie rod ends and Baer racing bump stop outer ends.
The car is equipped with Gobal West lower tubular control arms and aftermarket adjustable upper arms. The spindles and steering arms are stock, and the car was equipped with manual front drum brakes originally. I have since changed over to the Baer Track system.
My issue is that the tie rod ends appear to be too long. The replacement inner ends are threaded up to the same place on the body of the tie rod as the stock original, so that's not the issue. The sleeves are 8 3/4" long on the bump steer rod, and both ends are bottomed out. The wheels are toed in and seems to still lack about 3" from being able to set the wheels straight. I have contacted Baer and they say that the part number for the rod ends I purchaced are correct, and even ran the stamped numbers on the sleeve to verify they were correct.
Any ideas?

Thanks!

Last edited by yam924; 11-16-2010 at 10:33 PM. Reason: update and Pictures of project Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2010, 02:45 PM
strtlegal's Avatar
strtlegal strtlegal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surprise,Az
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Had the same problem, had no way of fixing it unless you add threads to the inner tie rod end and cut some off they are to long..I evern tried it with out the nut. I've scene several people have this problem but no one has mentioned what they've done to fix it...

Curious to see how it was fixed, you could pm James that one One Lap Camaro and find out what they did, since I know he is running them..

Good luck
__________________
70 Nova: LS2/Tko600. Speedtech Stuff

Chuck D
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2010, 03:43 PM
yam924 yam924 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info. I am very surprised that Baer is un-aware of this and what the fix is. I have spoken to two different guys over there and they don't seem to have any idea why I am having the issue. It seems as though a shorter sleeve would be the simple fix. The problem I would have with threading the tie rod further up the rod is that it steps up in diameter shortly after where the threads end now. I would have to machine the rod down to thread it further. They are replacement units I purchased from Rick's Camaro parts and the ball sockets are beefier, but other than that they are identical in thread lenght and over all length as my stock originals.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2010, 05:19 PM
strtlegal's Avatar
strtlegal strtlegal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surprise,Az
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Your right I forgot about that..You cant switch the outer tie rods for inners can you? I think the threads would be off right?
Well if someone else chimes in about the same problem send them a link to this site
__________________
70 Nova: LS2/Tko600. Speedtech Stuff

Chuck D
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2010, 06:03 PM
yam924 yam924 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

On 68 and 69 cars, both rod ends are right handed thread, so changing over an inner end would work, except then it is too short. Not enough of the threads would be into the sleeve to feel comfortable about leaning it into a corner. I may have to try and find another style inner rod end that I could cut and thread farther down unless someone out there has a better answer.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-11-2010, 09:48 AM
James OLC's Avatar
James OLC James OLC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,459
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I've used the Baer Tracker pieces on a couple of cars but have never encountered this issue. I wonder if there could be some variability in the length of the replacement tie rod ends?
__________________
James
1967 Camaro RS - The OLC
1967 Camaro RS - Recycler
1969 Camaro - Dusty
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-11-2010, 01:41 PM
yam924 yam924 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

That's what I thought also, but I still had the original inner rod end and measured them side by side and they are identical length. The over all length of the tie rod ends that were on the car, and what I have now is only about 1/2 inch difference (the old links are shorter) and there is alot of adjustment left. What really is driving me crazy more so than how to fix it, is what changed.
I seriously need a good 1 1/2" shorter over all length of the tie rods on each side to even get the wheels straight.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-11-2010, 02:23 PM
ErikLS2's Avatar
ErikLS2 ErikLS2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 462
Thanks: 10
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I'm just going from memory here and since I"m at work I can't look at my car. I believe the outer and inner tie rod ends vary considerably in length (the outer is shorter I think). If this was the case couldn't you try an OE outer tie rod end and see if you get it where it needs to be?

I will try to look at my car tonight, I have OE tie rod ends on mine. But like I said, just going from memory here so may be way off.
__________________
Erik

69 Camaro
Several other things with wheels and engines

https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=27133
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-11-2010, 02:56 PM
yam924 yam924 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You're correct, the outer is conciderably shorter than the innner, but unfortunately it is a little too short to get enough threads into the sleeve to make it work.
I am looking for another inner tie rod end that may be threaded further up the body, or not be "stepped up" so that I could thread it further and cut the length down.
I just dont uderstand what is different, and that is driving me CRAZY!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-16-2010, 10:27 PM
yam924 yam924 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Updated 69 Camaro inner tie rod end info and some pics of my project

OK, I found a solution for anyone out there that may have run into this issue. An outer tie rod end for a 69' Impala is the same specs as the inners on a 69 Camaro, but they are 1 1/2" shorter. I have purchased a pair of these and they seem like they are going to work. I included several pictures of the front sub-frame and some other shots of the car as it currently sits. The "Crown Jewell" of this project is the powertrain. A 900 plus HP Pro-Charged BBC with an all Brodix top end, aluminum flywheel and a Tremic TKO 600 5 speed. I went with a 427 instead of a 496 to make it a little more "human proof". The shorter rod angle should let me stand on it a little harder without the worry of it comming apart. I'll try and get some pictures of the engine posted this weekend.
Attached Images
          
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net