|

06-24-2006, 11:59 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Campbell Ca
Posts: 2,005
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
3 link vs 4 link
Ok guys I have some questions on both systems. When I rip the car back apart at years end I would like to know what system is best. I have some questions on both. First the Dynamics 3 link. How much of the rear seat will still be useable? It looks from the install pictures that you almost have to rid the rear seat, but it's hard for me to tell. Another point, I have enclosed a picture of the lateral load bolt that I was curious about. 
My questions are these. Is that bolt holding the entire unit from going to each side? To me it seems a bit scary that the entire rear is being held in place with this bolt. Also like my Comp bars, the end links seem to hang a little low as well. Also can you run any kind of rear end, or do you have to run a certain carrier? I see in all pictures that I have seen run the same carrier? It also seems like twice the fabrication for this system then a 4 link? Am I wrong?
Ok now the DSE system. I know a little bit about this already other then the new piece that is now coming in for the fix from the original design. Does anyone have a photo of this piece, and how does it connect to the system? How strong are these swivel links? How do they affix to each other? The top 2 links on the DSE seem very short, is this any kind of control issues with this design? Also the panhard bar that they use in the DSE system to keep the side from going back and fourth seems small. Also what about the rear seat? I will tub the car, so I know that the rear seat will have to again be modified, but I don't think, well really don't know if the DSE system will be as intrusive as the 3 link as far as the rear seat goes. Any ideas on that? I know that with the DSE system and when I tub it, I won't lose my custom gas tank, is this the case for the 3 link??
I don't mean to nit pick each system, but I have to for my own gain. I think both systems are the best in the business from where I stand and I need to know which is best for me. I can drive better then most, but cannot design anything other then custom lighting, so I'm at a loss, so this is why I ask. Sorry it's so long winded guys.
|

06-24-2006, 06:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paradise, Ca
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Ok guys I have some questions on both systems. When I rip the car back apart at years end I would like to know what system is best. I have some questions on both. First the Dynamics 3 link. How much of the rear seat will still be useable? It looks from the install pictures that you almost have to rid the rear seat, but it's hard for me to tell. Another point, I have enclosed a picture of the lateral load bolt that I was curious about. My questions are these. Is that bolt holding the entire unit from going to each side? To me it seems a bit scary that the entire rear is being held in place with this bolt. Also like my Comp bars, the end links seem to hang a little low as well. Also can you run any kind of rear end, or do you have to run a certain carrier? I see in all pictures that I have seen run the same carrier? It also seems like twice the fabrication for this system then a 4 link? Am I wrong?
|
1) You will need to run a split-bun type of rear seat with our kits. See attached picture.
2) Yes, the bellcrank and it's bolt and bearing are what holds the rear end laterally in the car. The bolt is a class 10.9 M20-2.5 and has an approximate shear strength of 36,500psi, and the bellcrank itself is made out of 2024 T6 aluminum, and was proven in FEA at 6,000psi in yield. Mark's had the prototype, which is a slightly inferior design, on his car for nearly two years now with absolutely no problems. Beyond that, this same Watt's setup and it's variations have been on extremely fast road race cars for many years. This is not a new design, we just adapted it to our likeing.
3) The LCA brackets on our rear ends will be off the ground by 4 5/8" with a 335/30/18 tire. This is a bit low, but we're not designing 4x4 suspensions either. That height was arrived at in order to get the excellent geometry we built into these suspensions. Ground clearence was kept in mind throughout the design process, however it mainly took a back seat to performance.
4) We supply fully welded 9"s with each kit, and this is the only option. The 9" is the obvious choice when you consider the fact that you can't reliably weld an UCA bracket to a cast iron housing. That, and the huge amount of aftermarket support for the 9". You can run any factory or aftermarket 3rd member you choose.
5) We tried our best to make this kit as easy to install as possible, but at the same time, we refuse to make huge compromises in geometry and function for the sake of a "bolt-in" kit. We realise that this will drive some potential customers into the arms of our competitors, and that's ok.
|

06-24-2006, 08:29 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 980
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Is there a limit on how heigh the wheels can be? say a 19 or 20 inch rear wheel?
|

06-24-2006, 09:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paradise, Ca
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|

06-24-2006, 10:19 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boerne, TX
Posts: 158
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
The "new" part for DSE's Quadra link is a reiforcement for the Pan hard bar bracket on the pass side frame rail. The attached letter states that if you use your car on the track, the reinforcement is recommended. They discovered this recently when they were testing the rear on a track.
You can still use your stock rear seat but you need to trim some of the springs on the bottom as well as the upper sides for the mini tubs.
|

06-24-2006, 10:54 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
wow nice B body, got anymore pics?
|

06-24-2006, 11:08 PM
|
Supporting Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South TX
Posts: 926
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Mark, is that the Mopar you told me about that was built in SA?
|

06-25-2006, 04:45 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 375
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Mark, is that the Mopar you told me about that was built in SA?
|
Yep, that's her. Pretty cool car, some really nice body mods, it's mean looking for sure. Really neat FI unit for the 6.1 HEMI engine too.
Mazspeed, take a look at our site for more info on the setup, if you haven't already (which it appears that you have), we tried to include a good amount of content to help explain our design approach. You already nailed it, this isn't a bolt in affair, in our educated and professional opinion, it's not a viable possibility due to the packaging constraints these cars have. We could have made a bolt in deal, but the performance compromises associated with that option are not ones that are not acceptable to us.
One clear point that sets our setup apart from every other unit out is the length of the control arms, as you noted. This was done with our eyes wide open, based upon the results of countless mathematical results, testing with our own car, and exhaustive research with folks that have been there, and done that (with a big emphasis on amateur and professional road race teams/engineers). At some point, you reach a point of diminishing returns, but longer is better, the physics say so. Stick axles need to be able to move up and down quite a bit to provide the most grip under a variety of circumstances, and as they move, the critical suspension geometry parameters change. The rate at which they change is directly proportional to the length of the links.
I have not personally installed the DSE system, but as you can imagine, I have seen several pictures of it. In relative terms, there might be a bit more work to install our setup, but it's not significant, it's actually a LOT easier if you construct your own rear housing, our setup comes with a completed fully welded housing. The main difference is that we insist loads be reacted through a rigid crossmember, our forward crossmember is probably the most tedious part to install, not hard, just tedious. If you have the ability to install a set of through floor subframe connectors, or if you are going to take on a mini-tub job, you can handle the installation of this kit.
Whatever you decide, have a great time with your car and enjoy the journey!
Best of luck,
Mark
Last edited by Mean 69; 06-25-2006 at 04:48 AM.
|

06-25-2006, 07:38 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,593
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
maz
here is a shot of how low the lca brackets are, which really are not that low, my car will be one of the lower cars with the 3 link in it and there is plenty of room, this kit can be installed in the same amount of time or less then a set of mini tubs with closeouts,
think about it, when one side of an axle goes into bump, it wants to go up and in towards the center of the car, so imagine the axle trying to do this with a 4 link whether it has swivels or not, it will bind, the swivels help it but the uper link just will not let the axle move smoothly, now think about it with a 3 link, it as good as it gets with a stick axle,

this is a shot of clearance, althought he car looks high the roof is 49 inches off the ground, and theres 6 inches to 5 inches the bottom of the rear end.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 AM.
|