...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2012, 03:24 PM
ironworks's Avatar
ironworks ironworks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 5,155
Thanks: 4
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Default Ironworks to build Fairway Chevrolet crate engine test car - 1970 Chevelle ZL1

This project should be a pretty easy one but a pretty interesting one as well. The guys from Fairway Chevrolet in Las Vegas, the dealership we buy all our Gm parts and Crate engines from contacted us about swapping the frame out from under this 1970 Chevelle that has been in the dealership stable for years. Don't worry it's not a numbers matching original car. They pieced it together years ago and put a 454HO in it. But as the owner describes, its just not fun to drive. We plan to fix that.

The owner of this car is also the owner of the 1957 Chevrolet running around with our chassis and an LS9 engine.

The plans for this car include an Ironworks custom chassis for a 1970 Chevelle, a new LSA engine with 6 speed trans, 18 and 19" wheels, custom brakes, fuel tank, and AutoRad core support. The car will not be repainted and will the interior color will remain the same to reuse some interior panels and maintain the original vibe and look of the car the owner loved.

Here are some pictures of how the car was when we picked it up yesterday in Vegas.




We plan to get some more detail shots and weigh the car next week. If all goes well me MIGHT have this car turned around for SEMA in November. We will see how the cards fall.
__________________
www.ironworksspeedandkustom.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2012, 05:27 PM
214Chevy's Avatar
214Chevy 214Chevy is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DALLAS, Texas
Posts: 4,690
Thanks: 459
Thanked 692 Times in 423 Posts
Default

Nice looking starting point. Love the maroon/deep reed interior with the black exterior.
__________________
'68 C10 swb
'69 Camaro convertible
'72 Chevelle

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-11-2012, 07:48 AM
Steve68 Steve68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: orlando fl
Posts: 965
Thanks: 49
Thanked 45 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Why run a staggered 18/19 combo, I don't understand,
__________________
68 SS Camaro LSX/T56 in work, SMD subframe, , DSE Mini tubs, Fikse Profil 13's, Alston G Link, and other parts!! ,

70 Nova SS street racer, ugly,
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11-2012, 11:09 AM
WILWAXU WILWAXU is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 1,207
Thanked 131 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Great looking starting point! Look forward to the build.
__________________
John Brown
Instagram @wilwaxu
Facebook @wilwaxu
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-11-2012, 12:27 PM
tooblue's Avatar
tooblue tooblue is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 47
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Going to be be NICE! .. ONE of MANY cars in that collection.
__________________
1995 Caprice,, LQ4 = 6.0 , L92, 4l65e, Phoenix AZ..
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/456803...caprice/page-1
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-11-2012, 10:31 PM
JKnight JKnight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 748
Thanks: 10
Thanked 68 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Well, hell....Everytime I think I've seen my next project on this site, something like this comes up. Is that not one of the most beautiful front ends ever put on a muscle car?

My first car (the second is my 69 Camaro) was a 70 Chevelle with red interior, so this is hitting kindof a soft spot for me.
__________________
Jeff: Project "Rolling Mockup" 69 Camaro SS, AFX, TKO600, Baer GT, etc
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2012, 06:56 AM
youthpastor's Avatar
youthpastor youthpastor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve68 View Post
Why run a staggered 18/19 combo, I don't understand,
I agree.....way too small- that thing will take a 20 in the rear all day long

20"and 19"

__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
CHRIS HOLSTROM CONCEPTS

http://chrisholstromconcepts.com/

Last edited by youthpastor; 08-14-2012 at 06:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-14-2012, 07:01 AM
ironworks's Avatar
ironworks ironworks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 5,155
Thanks: 4
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youthpastor View Post
I agree.....way too small- that thing will take a 20 in the rear all day long

20"and 19"
I'm sure a 20 can fit, but the style of wheels we are looking at come in 18's and 19's. Plus the larger wheel will raise the ride height. Once we have it on the ground we will make final decisions. At this point we like the 18 and 19 combo we already mocked up.

Just because you can does not always mean you should. That is a phrase for building cars.
__________________
www.ironworksspeedandkustom.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-14-2012, 07:24 AM
Steve68 Steve68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: orlando fl
Posts: 965
Thanks: 49
Thanked 45 Times in 33 Posts
Default

I'm not a fan of staggered wheel combos, but I see how you raise it with a bigger rear,

but I think anything 20 and over belongs on Impalas and the such vechicles, not a fan,
__________________
68 SS Camaro LSX/T56 in work, SMD subframe, , DSE Mini tubs, Fikse Profil 13's, Alston G Link, and other parts!! ,

70 Nova SS street racer, ugly,
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-25-2012, 08:22 PM
windycitychev windycitychev is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 210
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ironworks View Post
I'm sure a 20 can fit, but the style of wheels we are looking at come in 18's and 19's. Plus the larger wheel will raise the ride height. Once we have it on the ground we will make final decisions. At this point we like the 18 and 19 combo we already mocked up.

Just because you can does not always mean you should. That is a phrase for building cars.
I have a 68 chevelle wondering if 295/30/19 would fit the rear without mini tubs I'm going 18x8 front and 19x10 rear, please give me some input greatly appreciated
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net