Quote:
Originally Posted by PSV
CA Chassisworks has a new ad in the May Chevy High Performance with the g-bar for the camaro and Chevy II. They show 3 lower link styles: Poly bushing lower bar, Pivot Ball lower link, and Billet Pivot Ball Lower link. Is there an advantage to one vs the other? Is it just a cosmetic upgrade to use the billet? They also indicate that they are making Direct fit Fab-9 housings. How dose the fab-9 compare with the moser 9in for the g-bar?
|
The 3 different link bars are for 3 different scenarios. The urethane bushed bar is for the performance street car customer that wants a little better geometry, and the adjustability of the g-Bar. The Pivot Ball link bar has superior strength, consitency, and range of motion. This is the one I would recommend for someone who is pounding on their car, or is looking for that last bit of performance and handling. The Billet Link bar has the same range of motion, etc, as the regular Pivot ball arm, but is a little more of a show piece. You can not fine-tune the length of the lower arms on the billet arm, and that prevents you from the really precise fine tuning that some people will want. Ultimately it will not withstand as much abuse as the Pivot Ball arm, but will take plenty of pounding. The system is not ready yet, as Frank said, but it will be soon, it is literally at the top of the list of parts to finish.
It will have the 3 link bar options, 2 anti-roll bar options, 4+ inches of ride-height adjustment, options for single or double adjustable coil-overs, air springs, etc., as well as a direct-fit FAB9.
Tim